Back to Search Start Over

Preprocedural coronary computed tomography angiography in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry

Authors :
Bahadir Simsek
Farouc A. Jaffer
Spyridon Kostantinis
Judit Karacsonyi
Hideki Koike
Darshan Doshi
Khaldoon Alaswad
Sevket Gorgulu
Omer Goktekin
Jaikirshan Khatri
Paul Poommipanit
Oleg Krestyaninov
Rhian Davies
Ahmed ElGuindy
Brian K. Jefferson
Taral Patel
Mitul Patel
Stephane Rinfret
Wissam A. Jaber
William Nicholson
Nidal Abi Rafeh
Ufuk Yildirim
Korhan Soylu
Salman Allana
Bavana V. Rangan
Olga C. Mastrodemos
Yader Sandoval
M. Nicholas Burke
Emmanouil S. Brilakis
Source :
International Journal of Cardiology. 367:20-25
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Preprocedural coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be useful in procedural planning for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).We examined the clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics and outcomes of cases with vs. without preprocedural CCTA in PROGRESS-CTO (NCT02061436). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding factors.Of 7034 CTO PCI cases, preprocedural CCTA was used in 375 (5.3%) with increasing frequency over time. Patients with preprocedural CCTA had a higher prevalence of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (39% vs. 27%, p 0.001) and angiographically unfavorable characteristics including higher prevalence of proximal cap ambiguity (52% vs. 33%, p 0.001) and moderate/severe calcification (59% vs. 41%, p 0.001) compared with those without CCTA. CCTA helped resolve proximal cap ambiguity in 27%, identified significant calcium not seen on diagnostic angiography in 18%, changed estimated CTO length by5 mm in 10%, and was performed as part of initial coronary artery disease work up in 19%. CCTA cases had higher J-CTO (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3, p 0.001) and PROGRESS-CTO (1.3 ± 1.0 vs. 1.2 ± 1.0 p = 0.027) scores. After adjusting for potential confounders, cases with preprocedural CCTA had similar technical success (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.67) and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR: 1.47, 95% CI, 0.72-3.00).Preprocedural CCTA was used in ~5% of CTO PCI cases. While CCTA may help with procedural planning, especially in complex cases, technical success and MACE were similar with or without CCTA.

Details

ISSN :
01675273
Volume :
367
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e358e07755fb0a33adb6103f6822cc20