Back to Search Start Over

Further insight into self-face recognition in schizophrenia patients: Why ambiguity matters

Authors :
Catherine Bortolon
Robin N. Salesse
Delphine Capdevielle
Stéphane Raffard
Dynamique des capacités humaines et des conduites de santé (EPSYLON)
Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)
Fondation FondaMental [Créteil]
Neuropsychiatrie : recherche épidémiologique et clinique (PSNREC)
Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Euromov (EuroMov)
Université de Montpellier (UM)
Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)
Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UM3)-Université de Montpellier (UM)
Institut des Sciences du Mouvement Etienne Jules Marey (ISM)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)
Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)
Source :
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Elsevier, 2016, 50, pp.215-222. ⟨10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.09.006⟩, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Elsevier, 2016, 50, pp.215-222
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2016.

Abstract

Background Although some studies reported specifically self-face processing deficits in patients with schizophrenia disorder (SZ), it remains unclear whether these deficits rather reflect a more global face processing deficit. Contradictory results are probably due to the different methodologies employed and the lack of control of other confounding factors. Moreover, no study has so far evaluated possible daily life self-face recognition difficulties in SZ. Therefore, our primary objective was to investigate self-face recognition in patients suffering from SZ compared to healthy controls (HC) using an “objective measure” (reaction time and accuracy) and a “subjective measure” (self-report of daily self-face recognition difficulties). Method Twenty-four patients with SZ and 23 HC performed a self-face recognition task and completed a questionnaire evaluating daily difficulties in self-face recognition. Recognition task material consisted in three different faces (the own, a famous and an unknown) being morphed in steps of 20%. Results Results showed that SZ were overall slower than HC regardless of the face identity, but less accurate only for the faces containing 60%–40% morphing. Moreover, SZ and HC reported a similar amount of daily problems with self/other face recognition. No significant correlations were found between objective and subjective measures (p > 0.05). Limitations The small sample size and relatively mild severity of psychopathology does not allow us to generalize our results. Conclusions These results suggest that: (1) patients with SZ are as capable of recognizing their own face as HC, although they are susceptible to ambiguity; (2) there are far less self recognition deficits in schizophrenia patients than previously postulated.

Details

ISSN :
00057916
Volume :
50
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e5acf0736c244aad2154a19875c66b41