Back to Search Start Over

BRAF Status in Personalizing Treatment Approaches for Pediatric Gliomas

Authors :
Justin G. Meyerowitz
Xiaodong Yang
Mitchel S. Berger
Nalin Gupta
William A. Weiss
Daphne A. Haas-Kogan
Rintaro Hashizume
Aleksandra Olow
Angela J. Waanders
Claudia Petritsch
C. David James
Lukas J.A. Stalpers
Sabine Mueller
Adam C. Resnick
Other departments
CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam
Radiotherapy
Source :
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, vol 22, iss 21, Olow, Aleksandra; Mueller, Sabine; Yang, Xiaodong; Hashizume, Rintaro; Meyerowitz, Justin; Weiss, William; et al.(2016). BRAF Status in Personalizing Treatment Approaches for Pediatric Gliomas. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 22(21), 5312-5321. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1101. UCSF: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1fb9989s, Clinical cancer research, 22(21), 5312-5321. American Association for Cancer Research Inc.
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2016.

Abstract

Purpose: Alteration of the BRAF/MEK/MAPK pathway is the hallmark of pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs), and mTOR activation has been documented in the majority of these tumors. We investigated combinations of MEK1/2, BRAFV600E and mTOR inhibitors in gliomas carrying specific genetic alterations of the MAPK pathway. Experimental Design: We used human glioma lines containing BRAFV600E (adult high-grade: AM-38, DBTRG, PLGG: BT40), or wild-type BRAF (pediatric high-grade: SF188, SF9427, SF8628) and isogenic systems of KIAA1549:BRAF-expressing NIH/3T3 cells and BRAFV600E-expressing murine brain cells. Signaling inhibitors included everolimus (mTOR), PLX4720 (BRAFV600E), and AZD6244 (MEK1/2). Proliferation was determined using ATP-based assays. In vivo inhibitor activities were assessed in the BT40 PLGG xenograft model. Results: In BRAFV600E cells, the three possible doublet combinations of AZD6244, everolimus, and PLX4720 exhibited significantly greater effects on cell viability. In BRAFWT cells, everolimus + AZD6244 was superior compared with respective monotherapies. Similar results were found using isogenic murine cells. In KIAA1549:BRAF cells, MEK1/2 inhibition reduced cell viability and S-phase content, effects that were modestly augmented by mTOR inhibition. In vivo experiments in the BRAFV600E pediatric xenograft model BT40 showed the greatest survival advantage in mice treated with AZD6244 + PLX4720 (P < 0.01). Conclusions: In BRAFV600E tumors, combination of AZD6244 + PLX4720 is superior to monotherapy and to other combinatorial approaches. In BRAFWT pediatric gliomas, everolimus + AZD6244 is superior to either agent alone. KIAA1549:BRAF-expressing tumors display marked sensitivity to MEK1/2 inhibition. Application of these results to PLGG treatment must be exercised with caution because the dearth of PLGG models necessitated only a single patient-derived PLGG (BT40) in this study. Clin Cancer Res; 22(21); 5312–21. ©2016 AACR.

Details

ISSN :
10780432
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, vol 22, iss 21, Olow, Aleksandra; Mueller, Sabine; Yang, Xiaodong; Hashizume, Rintaro; Meyerowitz, Justin; Weiss, William; et al.(2016). BRAF Status in Personalizing Treatment Approaches for Pediatric Gliomas. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 22(21), 5312-5321. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1101. UCSF: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1fb9989s, Clinical cancer research, 22(21), 5312-5321. American Association for Cancer Research Inc.
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e630e623c10726b3c01334a337a86e9e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1101.