Back to Search
Start Over
Engineered versus hybrid cellular vesicles as efficient drug delivery systems: a comparative study with brain targeted vesicles
- Source :
- Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 11, 547-565 (2021)
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Herein we elaborated on methods to load cellular vesicles (CVs) and to incorporate cholesterol (Chol) and PEG lipids in their membrane, for enhancing the potential of such engineered CVs (e-CVs) as drug carriers. Hybrids formed by fusion between PEGylated liposomes (PEG-LIP) and CVs were evaluated as alternatives to e-CV, for the first time. Freeze-thawing cycles (FT) and incubation protocols were tested, and vesicle fusion was monitored by FRET dilution. B16F10, hCMEC/D3, and LLC cells were used for e-CV or hybrid development, and FITC-dextran as a model hydrophilic drug. Results show that dehydration rehydration vesicle (DRV) method is optimal for highest CV loading and integrity, while optimal protocols for Chol/PEG enrichment were identified. FT was found to be more efficient than incubation for hybrid formation. Interestingly, despite their high Chol content, CVs had very low integrity that was not increased by enrichment with Chol, but only after PEG coating; e-CVs demonstrated higher integrity than hybrids. Vesicle uptake by hCMEC cells is in the order: LIP
- Subjects :
- Liposome
Drug Carriers
Vesicle fusion
Chemistry
Vesicle
Biodistribution
Cellular Vesicles
Drug Delivery
Engineering
Exosomes
Fret
Hybrid
In Vivo
Mimetics
Uptake
Pharmaceutical Science
Brain
02 engineering and technology
021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology
equipment and supplies
030226 pharmacology & pharmacy
Polyethylene Glycols
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
fluids and secretions
Drug Delivery Systems
In vivo
PEG ratio
Drug delivery
Liposomes
Biophysics
0210 nano-technology
Drug carrier
Ex vivo
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 21903948
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Drug delivery and translational research
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e684841576655216bc4e29477cd09c19