Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of two prognostic scores for patients with parotid carcinoma
Comparison of two prognostic scores for patients with parotid carcinoma
- Source :
- Headneck. 31(9)
- Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- Background. Salivary glands present a wide di- versity in histopathologic types and biologic behaviors, thus complicating the search for prognostic factors. Methods. We compared 2 prognostic scores that were pre- viously published for patients with parotid carcinoma in a retro- spective series of 175 patients treated in a single institution. Results. Cox multivariate analysis indicated clinical skin invasion, facial nerve function, and perineural growth as the most significant recurrent disease-related prognostic factors. According to the Vander Poorten score, 148 patients were di- vided into 4 groups, with the 5-year disease-free survival of 76%, 81%, 69%, and 35%, respectively. In the Carrillo's score, the patients were divided into 3 groups: low-risk, intermediate- risk, and high-risk, with the 5-year disease-free survival of 84%, 73%, and 34%, respectively. Conclusion. Carrillo's score showed more distinct survival curves, and determination of groups with a more favorable prognosis was difficult for both scores. Therefore, both scores were not totally reproducible for our group of patients. V C 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 31: 1188-1195, 2009
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Multivariate analysis
Adolescent
Parotid carcinoma
Favorable prognosis
Gastroenterology
Disease-Free Survival
Young Adult
Internal medicine
medicine
Carcinoma
Humans
Child
Survival analysis
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
business.industry
Cancer
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Prognosis
Survival Analysis
Parotid gland
Surgery
Parotid Neoplasms
medicine.anatomical_structure
Otorhinolaryngology
Child, Preschool
Female
Facial nerve function
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10970347
- Volume :
- 31
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Headneck
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e6b9be0c4338b110e4fd8eb4fc409181