Back to Search Start Over

Effect of a sonic toothbrush on the abrasive dentine wear using toothpastes with different abrasivity values

Authors :
Philipp Körner
Blend Hamza
Entoni Uka
Florian J Wegehaupt
Thomas Attin
University of Zurich
Hamza, Blend
Source :
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2021.

Abstract

Objective This in vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of a sonic toothbrush on the resulting abrasive dentine wear using toothpastes with different abrasivities compared to the use of a manual toothbrush. Methods Ninety‐six bovine dentine samples were divided into six groups and subjected to a brushing sequence (sonic: 20 min, 0.9 N, 10 strokes/min; manual: 20 min, 1.6 N, 60 strokes/min) as follows: group 1: Elmex Sensitive Plus (RDA = 28) + manual toothbrush; group 2: Elmex Sensitive + sonic toothbrush; group 3: Elmex Kariesschutz (RDA = 65) + manual toothbrush; group 4: Elmex Kariesschutz +sonic toothbrush; group 5: Colgate Total Original (RDA = 121) + manual toothbrush; and group 6: Colgate Total Original +sonic toothbrush. The abrasive dentine wear was measured profilometrically. Results The median (IQR) abrasive dentine wear was as follows: Elmex Sensitive Plus (manual toothbrush: 2.7 µm (0.8), sonic toothbrush: 3.1 µm (1.9)); Elmex Kariesschutz (manual toothbrush: 4.9 µm (1.4), sonic toothbrush: 6.4 µm (2.1)); and Colgate Total Original (manual toothbrush: 5.2 µm (1.1), sonic toothbrush: 9.0 µm (3.1)). Differences in dentine wear between sonic and manual toothbrushes were statistically significant only in the groups brushed with Elmex Kariesschutz and Colgate Total Original (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion Brushing with a sonic toothbrush could result in a higher abrasive dentine wear compared to manual toothbrush when combined with toothpastes with high abrasivity values.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16015037 and 16015029
Volume :
19
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e6d04064c81caff9b8ffc65d51e943b7