Back to Search Start Over

Relative validity and reliability of isometric lower extremity strength assessment in older adults by using a handheld dynamometer

Authors :
Pol Grootswagers
Anouk M. M. Vaes
Roland Hangelbroek
Michael Tieland
Luc J. C. van Loon
Lisette C. P. G. M. de Groot
Humane Biologie
RS: NUTRIM - R3 - Respiratory & Age-related Health
Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy
Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy Research Group
Source :
Sports Health, 14(6), 899-905. Sage Periodicals Press, Sports Health, 14(6), 899-905, Sports Health, Sports Health 14 (2022) 6
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
SAGE Publications, 2022.

Abstract

Background: Handheld dynamometry (HHD) is a practical alternative to traditional testing of lower extremity strength. However, its reliability and validity across different populations and settings are not clear. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that HHD is a valid and reliable device to assess lower extremity strength in a population of older adults. Study Design: Cross-sectional/cohort. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: This study included 258 older adults (≥65 years). Isometric knee extension and flexion force were measured by 1 examiner, using an HHD (n = 222), including 3 repetitions to calculate within-day intrarater reliability. These measurements were repeated by the examiner in a subgroup (n = 23) to analyze intrarater reliability over a test-retest period of on average 8 weeks. In addition, HHD force measures were performed by a second examiner (n = 29) to analyze interrater reliability. In another subgroup (n = 77), isometric knee extension and flexion torque were measured by 1 examiner using both the HHD and Biodex System 4 to assess relative validity. Results: HHD and Biodex measurements were highly correlated and showed excellent concurrent validity. HHD systematically overestimated torque as compared with Biodex by 8 N·m on average. Same-day intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.97 to 0.98. Interrater reliability ICCs ranged from 0.83 to 0.95. Conclusion: HHD represents a reliable and valid alternative to Biodex to rank individuals on leg strength, or to assess within-person changes in leg strength over time, because of the high validity and reliability. The HHD is less suited for absolute strength assessment because of significant systematic overestimations. Clinical Relevance: Clinicians are encouraged to use HHD to rank older adults on leg strength, or to assess within-person changes in leg strength over time, but not to compare readings with cut-offs or normative values.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19417381
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Sports Health, 14(6), 899-905. Sage Periodicals Press, Sports Health, 14(6), 899-905, Sports Health, Sports Health 14 (2022) 6
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e7149d45e5faadc39912674e56697996