Back to Search Start Over

Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents

Authors :
Miles R. Silman
Lee J. T. White
Wolfgang Buermann
Simon L. Lewis
Michael A. Lefsky
Edward T. A. Mitchard
William Salas
Brian R. Zutta
Sandra Brown
Nancy L. Harris
Sassan Saatchi
Stephen J. Hagen
Alexandra C. Morel
Silvia Petrova
Source :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108:9899-9904
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011.

Abstract

Developing countries are required to produce robust estimates of forest carbon stocks for successful implementation of climate change mitigation policies related to reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD). Here we present a “benchmark” map of biomass carbon stocks over 2.5 billion ha of forests on three continents, encompassing all tropical forests, for the early 2000s, which will be invaluable for REDD assessments at both project and national scales. We mapped the total carbon stock in live biomass (above- and belowground), using a combination of data from 4,079 in situ inventory plots and satellite light detection and ranging (Lidar) samples of forest structure to estimate carbon storage, plus optical and microwave imagery (1-km resolution) to extrapolate over the landscape. The total biomass carbon stock of forests in the study region is estimated to be 247 Gt C, with 193 Gt C stored aboveground and 54 Gt C stored belowground in roots. Forests in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, and Southeast Asia accounted for 49%, 25%, and 26% of the total stock, respectively. By analyzing the errors propagated through the estimation process, uncertainty at the pixel level (100 ha) ranged from ±6% to ±53%, but was constrained at the typical project (10,000 ha) and national (>1,000,000 ha) scales at ca . ±5% and ca . ±1%, respectively. The benchmark map illustrates regional patterns and provides methodologically comparable estimates of carbon stocks for 75 developing countries where previous assessments were either poor or incomplete.

Details

ISSN :
10916490 and 00278424
Volume :
108
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e7fe6de976350822df3ec16c6d8d02ab
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019576108