Back to Search Start Over

International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM-HBP Surgery Project

Authors :
Ugo Boggi
Naoki Ikenaga
Shingo Kozono
Michael L. Kendrick
Goro Honda
Rong Liu
Yoo Seok Yoon
Giammauro Berardi
Yoshiya Ishikawa
F. Kunzler
Yoshiki Murase
Ryota Higuchi
Leon Sakuma
Hitoe Nishino
Go Wakabayashi
Kohei Nakata
Yuichi Nagakawa
Chie Takishita
Chung-Ngai Tang
Jin-Young Jang
Hiroki Yamaue
Shin-E Wang
Masao Tanaka
Brian K. P. Goh
Akihiko Tsuchida
Yoshiharu Nakamura
Jin He
Itaru Endo
Yusuke Watanabe
Chang Moo Kang
Shailesh V. Shrikhande
Hiroaki Osakabe
Anusak Yiengpruksawan
Chinnusamy Palanivelu
Masafumi Nakamura
Kyoichi Takaori
Minoru Tanabe
Giuseppe Zimmitti
Aya Maekawa
Christopher L. Wolfgang
Horacio J. Asbun
David A. Kooby
Ruben Ciria
Zi-Zheng Wang
Mohammed Abu Hilal
Takao Ohtsuka
Daisuke Ban
Giovanni Maria Garbarino
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background Surgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy-based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021). Methods Twenty-five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting. Results Four clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts. Conclusions The expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e80554235a075b209fe93c0ad394a1c5