Back to Search
Start Over
Preliminary Evaluation of Automated Speech Recognition Apps for the Hearing Impaired and Deaf
- Source :
- Frontiers in Digital Health, Vol 4 (2022), Frontiers in Digital Health, 4
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- ObjectiveAutomated speech recognition (ASR) systems have become increasingly sophisticated, accurate, and deployable on many digital devices, including on a smartphone. This pilot study aims to examine the speech recognition performance of ASR apps using audiological speech tests. In addition, we compare ASR speech recognition performance to normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners and evaluate if standard clinical audiological tests are a meaningful and quick measure of the performance of ASR apps.MethodsFour apps have been tested on a smartphone, respectively AVA, Earfy, Live Transcribe, and Speechy. The Dutch audiological speech tests performed were speech audiometry in quiet (Dutch CNC-test), Digits-in-Noise (DIN)-test with steady-state speech-shaped noise, sentences in quiet and in averaged long-term speech-shaped spectrum noise (Plomp-test). For comparison, the app's ability to transcribe a spoken dialogue (Dutch and English) was tested.ResultsAll apps scored at least 50% phonemes correct on the Dutch CNC-test for a conversational speech intensity level (65 dB SPL) and achieved 90–100% phoneme recognition at higher intensity levels. On the DIN-test, AVA and Live Transcribe had the lowest (best) signal-to-noise ratio +8 dB. The lowest signal-to-noise measured with the Plomp-test was +8 to 9 dB for Earfy (Android) and Live Transcribe (Android). Overall, the word error rate for the dialogue in English (19–34%) was lower (better) than for the Dutch dialogue (25–66%).ConclusionThe performance of the apps was limited on audiological tests that provide little linguistic context or use low signal to noise levels. For Dutch audiological speech tests in quiet, ASR apps performed similarly to a person with a moderate hearing loss. In noise, the ASR apps performed more poorly than most profoundly deaf people using a hearing aid or cochlear implant. Adding new performance metrics including the semantic difference as a function of SNR and reverberation time could help to monitor and further improve ASR performance.
- Subjects :
- hearing impairment
QA75.5-76.95
General Medicine
Sensory disorders Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 12]
(automatic speech recognition), automated speech recognition, (ASR)
Women's cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 17]
speech-to-text
voice-to-text technology
Electronic computers. Computer science
otorhinolaryngologic diseases
Medicine
evaluation metric
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
automated speech audiometry
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 2673253X
- Volume :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Frontiers in digital health
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e80747ec28be2ea1726f1875b1247837