Back to Search
Start Over
Complicated first-trimester pregnancies: evaluation with endovaginal US versus transabdominal technique
- Source :
- Radiology. 165:79-83
- Publication Year :
- 1987
- Publisher :
- Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), 1987.
-
Abstract
- Endovaginal ultrasound (US) was performed in 38 pregnant women at 5-12 menstrual weeks, when the initial transabdominal sonograms had been considered inconclusive or equivocal. Clinical follow-up disclosed 32 intrauterine pregnancies (12 living, 18 spontaneous incomplete abortions, and two embryonic demises) and six ectopic pregnancies. In the 32 intrauterine pregnancies (normal and abnormal), the correct diagnosis was made in all cases with endovaginal US. The endovaginal images demonstrated the intrauterine embryo, its heart motion, and the yolk sac more clearly and more often when these structures were not apparent on the transabdominal scans. Abnormal gestational sacs were better resolved. In the six cases of ectopic pregnancy, while an extrauterine ectopic sac was visualized in only three, absence of an intrauterine gestational sac was confirmed in all cases with endovaginal scanning. No endovaginal study yielded less information than its transabdominal counterpart. Endovaginal sonography is likely to be diagnostic when transabdominal images fail to yield a definitive diagnosis in early pregnancies.
- Subjects :
- Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
Gestational sac
Abortion
Incomplete Abortion
Pregnancy
Abdomen
medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Yolk sac
Ultrasonography
Gynecology
Ectopic pregnancy
Obstetrics
business.industry
medicine.disease
Abortion, Incomplete
Pregnancy, Ectopic
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Trimester, First
First trimester
medicine.anatomical_structure
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Vagina
Gestation
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15271315 and 00338419
- Volume :
- 165
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Radiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e99fab1a0e62614ef00e1c2f3d37186f
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.165.1.3306791