Back to Search Start Over

Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis

Authors :
Eugenio Pucci
Alessandra Lugaresi
Jeannette Lechner-Scott
Michael Barnett
Suzanne Hodgkinson
Maria Trojano
Franco Granella
Therese Burke
L. Mekhael
Helmut Butzkueven
Raed Alroughani
Guillermo Izquierdo
Pierre Grammond
Steve Vucic
Pierre Duquette
Eva Havrdova
Tim Spelman
Dana Horakova
Francois Grand'Maison
Spelman, T.
Mekhael, L.
Burke, T.
Butzkueven, H.
Hodgkinson, S.
Havrdova, E.
Horakova, D.
Duquette, P.
Izquierdo, G.
Grand'Maison, F.
Grammond, P.
Barnett, M.
Lechner-Scott, J.
Alroughani, R.
Trojano, M.
Lugaresi, A.
Granella, F.
Pucci, E.
Vucic, S
MSBase Study Group
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background and Purpose Early relapse outcomes in long-term stable patients switching from interferon β/glatiramer acetate (IFNβ/GA) to oral therapy are unknown. Objective The objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral therapy following a period of stable disease on IFNβ/GA, relative to a propensity-matched comparator of patients remaining on IFNβ/GA. Methods The MSBase cohort study is a global, longitudinal registry for MS. Time to first 6-month relapse in previously stable MS patients switching from platform injectables (‘switchers’) to oral agents were compared with propensity-matched patients remaining on IFNβ/GA (‘stayers’) using a Cox marginal model. Results Three-hundred and ninety-six switchers were successfully matched to 396 stayers on a 1:1 basis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients recording at least one relapse in the first 1−6 months by treatment arm (7.3% switchers, 6.6% stayers; P = 0.675). The mean annualized relapse rate (P = 0.493) and the rate of first 6-month relapse by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 2.11) were also comparable. There was no difference in the rate of disability progression by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 3.26). Conclusion This is the first study to compare early relapse switch probability in the period immediately following switch to oral treatment in a population previously stable on injectable therapy. There was no evidence of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of switching to oral therapy.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....e9be97a55863d28b83325316d9b52779