Back to Search
Start Over
Treatment Adherence in Patients with Lung Cancer from Prospects of Patients and Physicians
- Source :
- Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention, 2021.
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Adherence to treatment can be defined as the degree to which a patient’s behavior is consonant with medical or health advice he or she receive as part of his treatment regimen. The aim of this study was: 1) to measure the rate of treatment adherence to among patients with lung cancer from the prospect of both patients and physicians, 2) to measure the degree of concordance between the two prospect, and 3) to identify factors related to adherence for both prospect (patients and physicians). Materials and Methods: A total of 250 patients were included in this study. Information about socio-economic characteristics, depressive and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), nicotine dependence (Fagerstrom scale), barriers to accessing care, and the level of treatment adherence was collected through interview. Physicians were enquired about disease and treatment variables as well as patients’ level of adherence. Results: From the patient perspective, only 1.2% of patients displayed poor adherence; whereas the corresponding percentage among physicians was 12.4%. The concordance between the two was low: 0.244. The correlation of measurements made on the same individual was found to be equal to 0.14. Barriers to accessing medication (O.R.=2.82, 95% C.I.: 1.01-8.09) was the only risk factor when adherence was self-rated; barriers to accessing medication (O.R.=2.45, 95% C.I.: 1.03-5.86), education equal to 12 years (O.R.=0.33, 95% C.I.: 0.13-0.82) or higher than 12 years (O.R.=0.28, 95% C.I.: 0.08-0.96), nicotine dependence (O.R.=1.41, 95% C.I. 1.17-1.69) and HADS anxiety score (O.R.=1.15, 95% C.I. 1.03-1.30) were the predictors in physicians’ rating. Conclusions: Differences in rating adherence may underpin communication gaps between patients and physicians. Systemic determinants of poor adherence should not be overlooked. A concerted effort by researchers, physicians and policy makers in defining as well as communicating adherence, while removing its barriers should be made.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Lung Neoplasms
Treatment adherence
Attitude of Health Personnel
Concordance
Disease
Anxiety
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Risk Factors
medicine
Humans
Risk factor
Lung cancer
Depression (differential diagnoses)
patients’ and physicians’ prospects
Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Physician-Patient Relations
Greece
business.industry
Depression
General Medicine
medicine.disease
Treatment Adherence and Compliance
lung cancer
Family medicine
Educational Status
Female
medicine.symptom
business
Research Article
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2476762X and 15137368
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....e9fa28ed3e6a1505cc44d176002f8fc4