Back to Search
Start Over
Taking off into the wind: Unemployment risk and state-Dependent government spending multipliers
- Source :
- Séminaire invité, University of British Columbia, Séminaire invité, University of British Columbia, Nov 2019, Vancouver, Canada, Séminaire OFCE, Séminaire OFCE, Sep 2019, Paris, France, Séminaire DEEP, Université de Lausanne, Séminaire DEEP, Université de Lausanne, Oct 2019, Lausanne, Switzerland, Journal of Monetary Economics, Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, 2020, 117, pp. 990-1007. ⟨10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.07.007⟩, Workshop Meanfield games & heterogenous agents, Workshop Meanfield games & heterogenous agents, Sep 2019, Le Mans, France, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 117, pp. 990-1007, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2020, 117, pp. 990-1007. ⟨10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.07.007⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Highlights • We propose a model with uninsured unemployment risk that generates countercyclical spending multipliers • Government spending lowers precautionary saving, which further raises aggregate demand • Due to labor-market frictions, this channel is more potent in recession than in expansion<br />We propose a model with involuntary unemployment, incomplete markets, and nominal rigidity, in which the effects of government spending are state-dependent. An increase in government purchases raises aggregate demand, tightens the labor market and reduces unemployment. This in turn lowers unemployment risk and thus precautionary saving, leading to a larger response of private consumption than in a model with perfect insurance. The output multiplier is further amplified through a composition effect, as the fraction of high-consumption households in total population increases in response to the spending shock. These features, along with the matching frictions in the labor market, generate significantly larger multipliers in recessions than in expansions. As the pool of job seekers is larger during downturns than during expansions, the concavity of the job-finding probability with respect to market tightness implies that an increase in government spending reduces unemployment risk more in the former case than in the latter, giving rise to countercyclical multipliers.
- Subjects :
- Economics and Econometrics
media_common.quotation_subject
Monetary economics
Recession
Article
Incomplete markets
0502 economics and business
Economics
050207 economics
Involuntary unemployment
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Aggregate demand
State dependence
050205 econometrics
media_common
Government spending
Multipliers
JEL: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics/E.E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook/E.E6.E62 - Fiscal Policy
JEL: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics/E.E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy/E.E2.E21 - Consumption • Saving • Wealth
05 social sciences
Nominal rigidity
1. No poverty
[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
Shock (economics)
Precautionary saving
JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium/D.D5.D52 - Incomplete Markets
8. Economic growth
Unemployment
Unemployment risk
Finance
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03043932
- Volume :
- 117
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of monetary economics
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ea8af0275600cb1b3b8855b0545133dd
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.07.007⟩