Back to Search Start Over

Surface faulting during the 29 December 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake (Croatia)

Surface faulting during the 29 December 2020 Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake (Croatia)

Authors :
Sara Amoroso
Bruno Pace
Daniela Pantosti
Lua Minarelli
Marko Budić
Damir Palenik
Sotiris Valkaniotis
Rok Brajkovič
Matevž Novak
Lucilla Benedetti
Petra Jamšek Rupnik
Alessio Testa
Adrien Moulin
Radovan Filjak
Ana Novak
Francesco Iezzi
Stéphane Baize
Maxime Henriquet
Paolo Boncio
Branko Kordić
Marco Caciagli
Miloš Bavec
Stefano Pucci
Jure Atanackov
Francesca Romana Cinti
Marko Špelić
Bogomor Celarc
Paolo Marco De Martini
Riccardo Civico
Vlatko Brčić
Nikola Belić
Martija Vukovski
Josip Barbača
Rosa Nappi
University of Chieti-Pescara
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia - Sezione di Roma (INGV)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Geological Survey of Slovenia (GeoZS)
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN)
Hrvatski Geološki Institut - Croatian Geological Survey (HGI)
Centre européen de recherche et d'enseignement des géosciences de l'environnement (CEREGE)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
University of Ljubljana
Geological Survey of Slovenia
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire
Fontenay-aux-Roses
Source :
EGU General Assembly 2021, EGU General Assembly 2021, Apr 2021, Paris, France. ⟨10.5194/egusphere-egu21-16575⟩
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2021.

Abstract

The 29 December 2020, Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake nucleated at a depth of ~10 km in the Sisak-Moslavina County in northern Croatia, ~6 km WSW of the Petrinja town. Focal mechanisms, aftershocks distribution, and preliminary Sentinel-1 InSAR interferogram suggest that the NW-SE right-lateral strike-slip Pokupsko-Petrinja fault was the source of this event.The Croatian Geological Survey, joined by a European team of earthquake geologists from France, Slovenia and Italy, performed a prompt systematic survey of the area to map the surface effects of the earthquake. The field survey was guided by geological maps, preliminary morphotectonic mapping based on 1:5,000 topographical maps and InSAR interferogram. Locally, field mapping was aided by drone survey.We mapped unambiguous evidence of surface faulting at several sites between Župić to the NW and Hrastovica to the SE, in the central part of the Pokupsko-Petrinja fault, for a total length of ~6.5 km. This is probably a minimum length since several portions of the fault have not been explored yet, and in part crossing forbidden uncleared minefields. Surface faulting was observed on anthropic features (roads, walls) and on Quaternary sediments (soft colluvium and alluvium) and Miocene bedrock (calcarenites). The observed ruptures strike mostly NW-SE, with evidences of strike-slip right-lateral displacement and zones of extension (opening) or contraction (small pressure ridges, moletracks) atlocal bends of the rupture trace. Those ruptures are interpreted as evidences of coseismic surface faulting (primary effects) as they affect the morphology independently from the slope direction. Ground failures due to gravitational sliding and liquefaction occurrences were also observed, mapped and interpreted as secondary effects (see Amoroso et al., and Vukovski et al., this session). SE of Križ, the rupture broke a water pipeline with a right-lateral offset of several centimetres. Measured right-lateral net displacement varies from a few centimetres up to ~35 cm. A portion of the maximum measured displacement could be due to afterlisp, as it was mapped several days after the main shock. Hybrid surface ruptures (shear plus opening and liquefaction), striking SW-NE, with cm-size left-lateral strike-slip offsets were mapped on the northern side of the Petrinja town, ~3 km NE of the main fault.Overall, the rupture zone appears discontinuous. Several factors might be inferred to explain this pattern such as incomplete mapping of the rupture, inherited structural discontinuities within the Pokupsko-Petrinja fault system, or specific mechanical properties of the Neogene-Quaternary strata

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
EGU General Assembly 2021, EGU General Assembly 2021, Apr 2021, Paris, France. ⟨10.5194/egusphere-egu21-16575⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ebff27f9532e506579f753b88e7ad7dc
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-16575⟩