Back to Search Start Over

Layer-specific strain in patients with heart failure using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: not all layers are the same

Authors :
Jason R.B. Dyck
Justin A. Ezekowitz
Yoko Mikami
Lingyu Xu
D. Ian Paterson
Joseph J Pagano
Richard B. Thompson
Todd J. Anderson
James A. White
Andrew G Howarth
Mark J. Haykowksy
Gavin Y. Oudit
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2020), Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Background Global longitudinal strain (GLS), most commonly measured at the endocardium, has been shown to be superior to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) for the identification of systolic dysfunction and prediction of outcomes in heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that strains measured at different myocardial layers (endocardium = ENDO, epicardium = EPI, average = AVE) will have distinct diagnostic and predictive performance for patients with HF. Methods Layer-specific GLS, layer-specific global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) were evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) feature tracking in the Alberta HEART study. A total of 453 subjects consisted of healthy controls (controls, n = 77), at-risk for HF (at-risk, n = 143), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n = 87), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, n = 88) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n = 58). For outcomes analysis, CMR-derived imaging parameters were adjusted with a base model that included age and N-terminal prohormone of b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to test their independent association with 5-year all-cause mortality. Results GLS_EPI distinguished all groups with preserved LVEF (controls − 16.5 ± 2.4% vs. at-risk − 15.5 ± 2.7% vs. HFpEF − 14.1 ± 3.0%, p Conclusion Global strains measured on endocardium, epicardium or averaged across the wall thickness are not equivalent for the identification of systolic dysfunction or outcomes prediction in HF. The endocardium-specific strains were shown to have poorest all-around performance. GLS_AVE and GRS were the only CMR parameters to be significantly associated with 5-year all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis. GLS_EPI and GRS, as well as the difference in endocardial and epicardial strains, were sensitive to systolic dysfunction among HF patients with normal LVEF (> 55%), in whom lower strains were associated with increased concentricity.

Details

ISSN :
1532429X
Volume :
22
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ee34ca68efec97da6a931aa122fbeaf9