Back to Search
Start Over
Layer-specific strain in patients with heart failure using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: not all layers are the same
- Source :
- Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2020), Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Background Global longitudinal strain (GLS), most commonly measured at the endocardium, has been shown to be superior to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) for the identification of systolic dysfunction and prediction of outcomes in heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that strains measured at different myocardial layers (endocardium = ENDO, epicardium = EPI, average = AVE) will have distinct diagnostic and predictive performance for patients with HF. Methods Layer-specific GLS, layer-specific global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) were evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) feature tracking in the Alberta HEART study. A total of 453 subjects consisted of healthy controls (controls, n = 77), at-risk for HF (at-risk, n = 143), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n = 87), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, n = 88) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n = 58). For outcomes analysis, CMR-derived imaging parameters were adjusted with a base model that included age and N-terminal prohormone of b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to test their independent association with 5-year all-cause mortality. Results GLS_EPI distinguished all groups with preserved LVEF (controls − 16.5 ± 2.4% vs. at-risk − 15.5 ± 2.7% vs. HFpEF − 14.1 ± 3.0%, p Conclusion Global strains measured on endocardium, epicardium or averaged across the wall thickness are not equivalent for the identification of systolic dysfunction or outcomes prediction in HF. The endocardium-specific strains were shown to have poorest all-around performance. GLS_AVE and GRS were the only CMR parameters to be significantly associated with 5-year all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis. GLS_EPI and GRS, as well as the difference in endocardial and epicardial strains, were sensitive to systolic dysfunction among HF patients with normal LVEF (> 55%), in whom lower strains were associated with increased concentricity.
- Subjects :
- Male
lcsh:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.drug_class
Prohormone
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Heart failure
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Risk Assessment
Ventricular Function, Left
Alberta
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Predictive Value of Tests
Internal medicine
medicine
Natriuretic peptide
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
cardiovascular diseases
Layer-specific global longitudinal strain
Endocardium
Aged
Angiology
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Ejection fraction
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
medicine.diagnostic_test
Strain (chemistry)
business.industry
Research
Stroke Volume
Magnetic resonance imaging
Middle Aged
Prognosis
medicine.disease
Biomechanical Phenomena
Feature tracking
Heart Disease Risk Factors
lcsh:RC666-701
Case-Control Studies
Cardiology
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1532429X
- Volume :
- 22
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ee34ca68efec97da6a931aa122fbeaf9