Back to Search Start Over

Influence of tumor-associated macrophages and HLA class I expression according to HPV status in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemo/bioradiotherapy

Authors :
Julien Adam
Jean-Yves Scoazec
Ingrid Garberis
Dan Ou
Yungan Tao
Pierre Blanchard
A. Levy
Ingrid Breuskin
Stéphane Temam
Eric Deutsch
François Janot
Philippe Gorphe
Odile Casiraghi
Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique (RaMo-IT)
Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Saclay
Source :
Radiotherapy and Oncology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Elsevier, 2019, 130, pp.89-96. ⟨10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.013⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

To investigate the prognostic value of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and HLA class I expression according to HPV status in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy combining cisplatin (CRT) or cetuximab (BRT).Ninety-five patients were enrolled. The density of CD68+ cells and CD68+ CD163+ cells (further referred as M2) in the intraepithelial and the stromal compartments, respectively, as well as HLA class I expression in tumor cells, were evaluated semi-quantitatively. Correlations between biomarker expression and treatment outcomes were analyzed.Multivariate analysis showed that the intraepithelial macrophage density (IEMD) was prognostic for favorable progression-free survival (PFS) and there was a non-significant trend for improved overall survival (OS). HLA class I down-regulation was not an independent prognostic factor. Subgroup analysis showed that in p16+ population, patients with high IEMD had improved 5-year PFS vs. patients with low IEMD (81.2% vs. 25.0%, p 0.001), while in p16- population, no difference was observed. Similarly, when stratified by primary tumor site, IEMD showed prognostic value in oropharyngeal cancer patients (OPC) but not non-OPC patients. Five-year PFS of patients with low stromal M2 macrophage density treated with CRT was significantly improved vs. those with BRT (54.5% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.03), while in tumors with high M2, there was no significant difference (50.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.67).The prognostic role of TAM phenotype and distribution depends on HPV status and might predict treatment response. They prompt further validation in prospective studies.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01678140
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and Oncology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Elsevier, 2019, 130, pp.89-96. ⟨10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.013⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ee6226b6781f7a7de6cd34e1b3b9d3ec