Immobilisation of torus fractures of the wrist in children (FORCE): a randomised controlled equivalence trial in the UK

Background: Torus (buckle) fractures of the wrist are the most common fractures in children, involving the distal radius and/or ulna. It is unclear if children require rigid immobilisation and follow-up, or would equally recover by being discharged without any immobilisation or a bandage. Given the large number of these injuries, identifying the optimal treatment strategy could have important effects on the child, school absences and NHS costs. Objectives: To establish whether treating children with a distal radius torus fracture with the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge (“offer of bandage”), provides the same recovery, in terms of pain, function, complications, acceptability, school absence and resource use, as treatment with rigid immobilisation and follow-up as per usual practice (“rigid immobilisation”). Design: A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled equivalence trial. Setting: 23 UK Emergency Departments. Participants: 965 children (4-15 years) with a distal radius torus fracture were randomised from January 2019 to July 2020 using a secure, centralised, online encrypted randomisation service. Exclusion criteria included presentation >36 hours after injury, multiple injuries and inability to complete follow-up. Interventions: Offer of bandage (n= 489) of whom the bandage was applied in 458, versus rigid immobilisation (n= 476). Participants and clinicians were not blinded to the treatment allocation. Main outcome measures: Pain at 3-days post-randomisation measured using the WongBaker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes were the PROMIS Upper Extremity score for children, health related quality of life (QoL), complications, school absence, analgesia use and resource use collected up to 6 weeks post-randomisation. Results: 94% of participants provided primary outcome data. Pain was equivalent at the 3 day primary outcome for both groups. With reference to the pre-specified equivalence margin of 1.0, the adjusted difference in the intention-to-treat population was -0.10; 95% CI -0.37 to 0.17 and the per-protocol population was -0.06; 95% CI -0.34 to 0.21. There was equivalence in pain for both age subgroups (4-7 and 8–15 years). There was no difference in the rate of complications, with five (1.0%) in the offer of bandage group and three (0.6%) in the rigid immobilisation group. There were no differences between treatment groups in functional recovery, QoL or school absence at any point during follow-up. Analgesia use was marginally higher at Day 1 in the offer of bandage group (83% vs 78% participants), though was no different at other times. The offer of bandage significantly reduced the cost of treatment, and had a high probability of cost-effectiveness. Limitations: Families had a strong pre-existing preference for rigid immobilisation. Given this, and the inability to blind families to the treatment allocation, observer bias was a concern. However, there was clear evidence of equivalence. Conclusions: The study findings support the offer of bandage in children with a distal radius torus fracture.