Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types

Authors :
Hana Ji
Michael C. Abundo
Amir Ghorbani
Chang-Won Lee
Kara J.M. Taylor
Timothy J. Johnson
Bonnie P. Weber
Mahesh K C
John M. Ngunjiri
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 1, p e0241732 (2021), PLoS ONE
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2021.

Abstract

Characterization of poultry microbiota is becoming increasingly important due to the growing need for microbiome-based interventions to improve poultry health and production performance. However, the lack of standardized protocols for sampling, sample processing, DNA extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis can hinder data comparison between studies. Here, we investigated how the DNA extraction process affects microbial community compositions and diversity metrics in different chicken respiratory sample types including choanal and tracheal swabs, nasal cavity and tracheal washes, and lower respiratory lavage. We did a side-by-side comparison of the performances of Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue (BT) and ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep (ZB) kits. In general, samples extracted with the BT kit yielded higher concentrations of total DNA while those extracted with the ZB kit contained higher numbers of bacterial 16S rRNA gene copies per unit volume. Therefore, the samples were normalized to equal amounts of 16S rRNA gene copies prior to sequencing. For each sample type, all predominant bacterial taxa detected in samples extracted with one kit were present in replicate samples extracted with the other kit and did not show significant differences at the class level. However, a few differentially abundant shared taxa were observed at family and genus levels. Furthermore, between-kit differences in alpha and beta diversity metrics at the amplicon sequence variant level were statistically indistinguishable. Therefore, both kits perform similarly in terms of 16S rRNA gene-based poultry microbiome analysis for the sample types analyzed in this study.

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLOS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ef7380dbe25bbf0a1f986fd5f9208618