Back to Search Start Over

Pattern reversal visual evoked response and Snellen visual acuity

Authors :
Charlene J. Skladzien
Mehul C. Mehta
Elizabeth W. Larson-Park
Osamu Katsumi
Tatsuo Hirose
Source :
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 232(5)
Publication Year :
1994

Abstract

Because the pattern-reversal visual evoked response (PVER) reflects the central retinal function, PVER results generally agree with those of psychophysical tests. The visual acuities (VAs) calculated from PVER recordings and Snellen acuity (SA) measurements were compared in 500 eyes (261 patients; ages 8 to 88 years; mean, 44.5 years). The best-corrected VA was measured using the ETDRS chart, and the PVER acuity was determined by the smallest check size that produced a definite PVER (critical check size). In 288 eyes with a critical check size of 10 min of arc, the SAs ranged from 20/15 to 20/800 (mean 20/38). In 68 eyes with a critical check size of 20 min, the SAs ranged from 20/15 to 20/800 (mean 20/97). In 70 eyes with a critical check size of 40 min, the SAs ranged from 20/20 to 20/1600 (mean 20/156). In 29 eyes with a critical check size of 80 min and 14 eyes with a critical check size of 160 min, the SAs ranged from 20/50 to 20/1600 (mean 20/312 and 20/398, respectively). In 31 eyes in which the PVER was non-recordable, the SAs ranged from 20/70 to 20/3200 (mean 20/1177). The PVER acuity using the smallest check size seemed to agree with the SA, but large deviations were observed in certain subjects.

Details

ISSN :
0721832X
Volume :
232
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....efdd81a8363b906da7e70b4968c35400