Back to Search Start Over

Reduction of inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing therapies and shocks by a novel suite of detection algorithms in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: a historical comparison of a prospective database

Authors :
Maurizio Gasparini
Luca Tomasi
Emanuela H. Locati
Alessandro Proclemer
Elisabetta Daleffe
Maria Stella Baccillieri
Maurizio Landolina
Giuseppe Boriani
Giulio Molon
Maurizio Lunati
Michele Massimo Gulizia
Renato Pietro Ricci
Roberto Rordorf
Domenico Catanzariti
Source :
Europace. 18:1391-1398
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2016.

Abstract

Aims Implantable cardioverter defibrillators improve survival of patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias, but inappropriate shocks occur in up to 30% of patients and have been associated with worse quality of life and prognosis. In heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds), we evaluated whether a new generation of detection and discrimination algorithms reduces inappropriate shocks. Methods and results We analysed 1983 Medtronic CRT-D patients (80% male, 67 ± 10 years), 1368 with standard devices (Control CRT-D) and 615 with new generation devices (New CRT-D). Expert electrophysiologists reviewed and classified the electrograms of all device-detected ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation episodes. Total follow-up was 3751 patients-years. Incidence of inappropriate shocks at 1 year was 2.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.0–3.5] in Control CRT-D and 0.9% (CI = 0.4–2.2) in New CRT-D (hazard ratio = 0.37, CI = 0.21–0.66, P < 0.001). In New CRT-D, inappropriate shocks were reduced by 77% [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.23, CI = 0.16–0.35, P < 0.001] and inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing by 81% (IRR = 0.19, CI = 0.11–0.335, P < 0.001). Annual rate per 100 patient-years for appropriate VF detections was 3.0 (CI = 2.1–4.2) in New CRT-D and 3.2 (CI = 2.1–5.0) in Control CRT-D ( P = 0.68), for syncope was 0.4 (CI = 0.2–0.9) in New CRT-D and 0.7 (CI = 0.5–1.0) in Control CRT-D ( P = 0.266), and for death was 1.0 (CI = 0.6–1.6) in New CRT-D and 3.5 (CI = 3.0–4.1) in Control CRT-D ( P < 0.001). Conclusion Detection and discrimination algorithms used in new generation CRT-D significantly reduced inappropriate shocks when compared with standard CRT-D. This result, with no compromise on VF sensitivity or risk of syncope, has important implications for patients' quality of life and prognosis.

Details

ISSN :
15322092 and 10995129
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Europace
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f1b06672fe6c0fb682fe3a54c3f0b6e0
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv420