Back to Search Start Over

Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for age-related macular degeneration: 2-year findings from the IVAN randomised trial

Authors :
Chris A Rogers
Susan M. Downes
Helen Dakin
James Raftery
Usha Chakravarthy
Andrew J. Lotery
Simon P. Harding
Sarah Wordsworth
Giselle Abangma
Barnaby C Reeves
Source :
BMJ Open
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objective To assess the incremental cost and costeffectiveness of continuous and discontinuous regimens of bevacizumab (Avastin) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Design A within-trial cost-utility analysis with a 2-year time horizon, based on a multicentre factorial, noninferiority randomised controlled trial. Setting 23 hospital ophthalmology clinics. Participants 610 patients aged ≥50 years with untreated nAMD in the study eye. Interventions 0.5 mg ranibizumab or 1.25 mg bevacizumab given continuously (monthly) or discontinuously (as-needed) for 2 years. Main outcome measures Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Results Total 2-year costs ranged from £3002/patient ($4700; 95% CI £2601 to £3403) for discontinuous bevacizumab to £18 590/patient ($29 106; 95% CI £18 258 to £18 922) for continuous ranibizumab. Ranibizumab was significantly more costly than bevacizumab for both continuous (+£14 989/patient ($23 468); 95% CI £14 522 to £15 456; p Conclusions Ranibizumab is not cost-effective compared with bevacizumab, being substantially more costly and producing little or no QALY gain. Discontinuous bevacizumab is likely to be the most cost-effective of the four treatment strategies evaluated in this UK trial, although there is a 37% chance that continuous bevacizumab is cost-effective.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
4
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
BMJ open
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f26e76ecaf75873b336965f43bab444f