Back to Search Start Over

Nintedanib for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (LUME-Colon 1): a phase III, international, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Authors :
Van Cutsem, E
Yoshino, T
Lenz, H J
Lonardi, S
Falcone, A
Limón, M L
Saunders, M
Sobrero, A
Park, Y S
Ferreiro, R
Hong, Y S
Tomasek, J
Taniguchi, H
Ciardiello, F
Stoehr, J
Oum'Hamed, Z
Vlassak, S
Studeny, M
Argiles, G
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Van Cutsem, E
Yoshino, T
Lenz, H J
Lonardi, S
Falcone, A
Limón, M L
Saunders, M
Sobrero, A
Park, Y S
Ferreiro, R
Hong, Y S
Tomasek, J
Taniguchi, H
Ciardiello, F
Stoehr, J
Oum'Hamed, Z
Vlassak, S
Studeny, M
Argiles, G
Source :
Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Annals of Oncology
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is critical to colorectal cancer (CRC) growth and metastasis. Phase I/II studies have demonstrated the efficacy of nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic CRC. This global, randomized, phase III study investigated the efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with refractory CRC after failure of standard therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, with histologically/cytologically confirmed metastatic/locally advanced CRC adenocarcinoma unamenable to surgery and/or radiotherapy) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive nintedanib (200 mg twice daily) or placebo (twice daily), until disease progression or undue toxicity. Patients were stratified by previous regorafenib, time from onset of metastatic disease to randomization, and region. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by central review. Secondary end points included objective tumor response and disease control by central review. RESULTS: From October 2014 to January 2016, 768 patients were randomized; 765 were treated (nintedanib n = 384; placebo n = 381). Median follow-up was 13.4 months (interquartile range 11.1-15.7). OS was not improved [median OS 6.4 months with nintedanib versus 6.0 months with placebo; hazard ratio (HR), 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.19; P = 0.8659]. There was a significant but modest increase in PFS with nintedanib versus placebo (median PFS 1.5 versus 1.4 months, respectively; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.49-0.69; P

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Repositorio Institucional de la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Annals of Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f41d65dc8d8674d58105961d203252fe