Back to Search Start Over

A narrative review: depth of response as a predictor of the long-term outcomes for solid tumors

Authors :
Xin Li
Xiaohui Xie
Wenxiu Yao
Source :
Translational Cancer Research
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
AME Publishing Company, 2021.

Abstract

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) is classical and popular for public. However, there are some problems recently. For example, partial response ranges from 30% to 99%, objective response is dichotomous, so there may be some heterogeneity. New metrics for evaluating the efficacy have been investigating, such as early tumor shrinkage, time to response and depth of response (DpR). DpR has been used in hematologic malignancies and is considered as a predictor of efficiency. In solid tumors, DpR was firstly proposed by Mansmann et al. in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and defined as the percentage of tumor shrinkage, which is a continuous metric, and could avoid the information loss due to dichotomization of responses that has been widely applied to several kinds of solid tumors. Some authors have found associations between DpR and OS, DpR is a valuable surrogate endpoint for mCRC, metastatic breast cancer, metastatic melanoma and advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the predictive value of DpR is still uncertain in the research of lung cancer and gastric cancer. Which indicating that a mature and unified application standard has not yet been formed for DpR. This article summarizes researches on the DpR as a predictor of the long-term outcomes for solid tumors, it also discusses the challenges and limitations in the applications of DpR.

Details

ISSN :
22196803 and 2218676X
Volume :
10
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Translational Cancer Research
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f59e8a68cb6217127f67ab2d5164bd67
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2547