Back to Search Start Over

Influenza virus infection history shapes antibody responses to influenza vaccination

Authors :
Maria Auladell
Hoang Vu Mai Phuong
Le Thi Quynh Mai
Yeu-Yang Tseng
Louise Carolan
Sam Wilks
Pham Quang Thai
David Price
Nguyen Thanh Duong
Nguyen Le Khang Hang
Le Thi Thanh
Nguyen Thi Hong Thuong
Tran Thi Kieu Huong
Nguyen Thi Ngoc Diep
Vu Thi Ngoc Bich
Arseniy Khvorov
Luca Hensen
Tran Nhu Duong
Katherine Kedzierska
Dang Duc Anh
Heiman Wertheim
Scott D. Boyd
Kim L. Good-Jacobson
Derek Smith
Ian Barr
Sheena Sullivan
H. Rogier van Doorn
Annette Fox
Source :
Nature Medicine, 28, 2, pp. 363-372, Nature Medicine, 28, 363-372
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 248619.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Studies of successive vaccination suggest that immunological memory against past influenza viruses may limit responses to vaccines containing current strains. The impact of memory induced by prior infection is rarely considered and is difficult to ascertain, because infections are often subclinical. This study investigated influenza vaccination among adults from the Ha Nam cohort (Vietnam), who were purposefully selected to include 72 with and 28 without documented influenza A(H3N2) infection during the preceding 9 years (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12621000110886). The primary outcome was the effect of prior influenza A(H3N2) infection on hemagglutinin-inhibiting antibody responses induced by a locally available influenza vaccine administered in November 2016. Baseline and postvaccination sera were titrated against 40 influenza A(H3N2) strains spanning 1968-2018. At each time point (baseline, day 14 and day 280), geometric mean antibody titers against 2008-2018 strains were higher among participants with recent infection (34 (29-40), 187 (154-227) and 86 (72-103)) than among participants without recent infection (19 (17-22), 91 (64-130) and 38 (30-49)). On days 14 and 280, mean titer rises against 2014-2018 strains were 6.1-fold (5.0- to 7.4-fold) and 2.6-fold (2.2- to 3.1-fold) for participants with recent infection versus 4.8-fold (3.5- to 6.7-fold) and 1.9-fold (1.5- to 2.3-fold) for those without. One of 72 vaccinees with recent infection versus 4 of 28 without developed symptomatic A(H3N2) infection in the season after vaccination (P = 0.021). The range of A(H3N2) viruses recognized by vaccine-induced antibodies was associated with the prior infection strain. These results suggest that recall of immunological memory induced by prior infection enhances antibody responses to inactivated influenza vaccine and is important to attain protective antibody titers.

Details

ISSN :
1546170X and 10788956
Volume :
28
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Nature medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f5cf02ecbe89f7a5d42d91df61bdbd29