Back to Search
Start Over
Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials
- Source :
- Brain Stimulation, Vol 12, Iss 6, Pp 1537-1552 (2019)
- Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes voltage deflections in electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings, known as TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), which are increasingly used to study brain dynamics. However, the extent to which TEPs reflect activity directly evoked by magnetic rather than sensory stimulation is unclear.ObjectiveTo characterize and minimize the contribution of sensory inputs to TEPs.MethodsTwenty-four healthy participants received TMS over the motor cortex using two different intensities (below and above cortical motor threshold) and waveforms (monophasic, biphasic). TMS was also applied over the shoulder as a multisensory control condition. Common sensory attenuation measures, including coil padding and noise masking, were adopted. We examined spatiotemporal relationships between the EEG responses to the scalp and shoulder stimulations at sensor and source levels. Furthermore, we compared three different filters (independent component analysis, signal-space projection with source informed reconstruction (SSP-SIR) and linear regression) designed to attenuate the impact of sensory inputs on TEPs.ResultsThe responses to the scalp and shoulder stimulations were correlated in both temporal and spatial domains, especially after ∼60 ms, regardless of the intensity and stimuli waveform. Among the three filters, SSP-SIR showed the best trade-off between removing sensory-related signals while preserving data not related to the control condition.ConclusionsThe findings demonstrate that TEPs elicited by motor cortex TMS reflect a combination of transcranially and peripherally evoked brain responses despite adopting sensory attenuation methods during experiments, thereby highlighting the importance of adopting sensory control conditions in TMS-EEG studies. Offline filters may help to isolate the transcranial component of the TEP from its peripheral component, but only if these components express different spatiotemporal patterns. More realistic control conditions may help to improve the characterization and attenuation of sensory inputs to TEPs, especially in early responses.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Adolescent
Computer science
medicine.medical_treatment
Biophysics
Sensory system
Stimulus (physiology)
Electroencephalography
050105 experimental psychology
lcsh:RC321-571
03 medical and health sciences
Neural activity
Young Adult
0302 clinical medicine
PEPs
medicine
TMS-Evoked potential
Humans
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Sensory stimulation therapy
Sensory attenuation
medicine.diagnostic_test
TEPs
General Neuroscience
05 social sciences
Peripherally-evoked
Motor Cortex
Evoked Potentials, Motor
Independent component analysis
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Healthy Volunteers
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
medicine.anatomical_structure
TMS
Scalp
Female
Neurology (clinical)
Neuroscience
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Potentials
Motor cortex
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 18764754 and 1935861X
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Brain stimulation
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f64b500a143618af80a977eea58c5029