Back to Search Start Over

Nasal High Flow at 25 L/min or Expiratory Resistive Load do Not Improve Regional Lung Function in Patients with COPD: A Functional CT Imaging Study

Authors :
Julien G. Cohen
Ludovic Broche
Mohammed Machichi
Gilbert R. Ferretti
Renaud Tamisier
Jean-Louis Pépin
Sam Bayat
CHU Grenoble
Hospital Pourtalès [Neuchâtel, Switzerland]
European Synchroton Radiation Facility [Grenoble] (ESRF)
Synchrotron Radiation for Biomedicine = Rayonnement SynchroTROn pour la Recherche BiomédicalE (STROBE)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)
Hypoxie et PhysioPathologie (HP2)
ORANGE, Colette
Source :
Frontiers in Physiology, Vol 12 (2021), Frontiers in Physiology, Frontiers in Physiology, 2021, 12, pp.683316-1683316-7. ⟨10.3389/fphys.2021.683316⟩, 'Frontiers in Physiology ', vol: 12, pages: 683316-1683316-7 (2021)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Research Square Platform LLC, 2020.

Abstract

BackgroundNasal high flow (NHF) is a non-invasive breathing therapy that is based on the delivery via a large-caliber nasal cannula of heated and humidified air at flow rates that exceed peak inspiratory flow. It is thought that positive airway pressure generated by NHF can help reduce gas trapping and improve regional lung ventilation. There are no data to confirm this hypothesis at flow rates applicable in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.MethodsIn this study, we used non-rigid registration of computed tomography (CT) images acquired at maximal expiration and inspiration to compute regional lung attenuation changes (ΔHU), and lung displacement (LD), indices of regional lung ventilation. Parametric response maps (Galban et al., 2012) were also computed in each experimental condition. Eight COPD patients were assessed at baseline (BL) and after 5 min of NHF and expiratory resistive loading (ERL).ResultsΔHU was: BL (median, IQR): 85 (67.2, 102.8); NHF: 90.7 (57.4, 97.6); ERL: 74.6 (46.4, 89.6) HU (p = 0.531); and LD: 27.8 (22.3, 39.3); 17.6 (15.4, 27.9); and 20.4 (16.6, 23.6) mm (p = 0.120) in the 3 conditions, respectively. No significant difference in trapping was observed. Respiratory rate significantly decreased with both treatments [BL: 17.3 (16.4, 18.9); NHF: 13.7; ERL: 11.4 (9.6, 13.2) bpm; and p < 0.001].ConclusionNeither NHF at 25 L/min nor ERL significantly improved the regional lung ventilation of stable COPD patients with gas trapping, based on functional lung CT imaging. Further study including more subjects is needed to assess the potential effect of NHF on regional lung function at higher flow rates.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov/under, identifier NCT03821311.

Details

ISSN :
1664042X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Frontiers in Physiology, Vol 12 (2021), Frontiers in Physiology, Frontiers in Physiology, 2021, 12, pp.683316-1683316-7. ⟨10.3389/fphys.2021.683316⟩, 'Frontiers in Physiology ', vol: 12, pages: 683316-1683316-7 (2021)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f6956010efae5ef960370d60a210c115
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-96171/v1