Back to Search Start Over

Comparing cost-utility of DMARDs in autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis patients

Authors :
Jong Pascal Hendrik Pieter de
Hazes Johanna Maria Wilhelmina
Mulligen van Elise
Luurssen-Masurel Nathalie
Weel Angelique Elisabeth Adriana Maria
Rheumatology
Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
Source :
Rheumatology (Oxford, England), Rheumatology (United Kingdom), 60(12), 5765-5774. Oxford University Press
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the 1-year cost-effectiveness between three different initial treatment strategies in autoantibody-negative RA patients, according to 2010 criteria. Methods For this analysis we selected all RA patients within the intermediate probability stratum of the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (tREACH) trial. The tREACH had a treat-to-target approach, aiming for low DAS Results Average quality-adjusted life-years (s.d.), for iMTX, iHCQ and iGCs were respectively 0.71 (0.14), 0.73 (0.14) and 0.71 (0.15). The average total costs (s.d.) for iMTX, iHCQ and iGCs were, respectively, €10 832 (14.763), €11 208 (12.801) and €10 502 (11.973). Healthcare costs were mainly determined by biological costs, which were significantly lower in the iHCQ group compared with iGCs (P Conclusion iHCQ had the lowest healthcare and highest productivity costs, resulting in a non-significant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. However, iHCQ had the highest chance of being cost-effective at the Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold for healthcare reimbursement. Therefore, we believe that iHCQ is a good alternative to iMTX in autoantibody-negative RA patients, but validation is needed. Clinical trial registration number ISRCTN26791028

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14620324
Volume :
60
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Rheumatology (United Kingdom)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f6d4c12f878805cf847f756126438dd8