Epidural analgesia versus intravenous analgesia after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Postoperative pain control after the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) is essential, but there is a controversy about a better analgesic method between epidural and intravenous (IV) analgesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of epidural versus IV analgesia following MIRPE. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized control trials (RCTs) dated up to 31st May 2021. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the weighted mean visual analog scale (VAS) after MIRPE. The secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea, operation time, total operating room time, and postoperative length of hospital stay. Results Four RCTs involving 243 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. The AUC of the weighted mean VAS was 343.62 in the epidural group and 375.24 in IV group. Epidural group showed lower VAS than IV group at 12 hours (mean difference -0.99 [95% CI: -1.52, -0.47], P = 0.001, I2 = 0%), at 24 hours (mean difference -0.65 [95% CI: -1.15, -0.16], P = 0.009, I2 = 0%), and 48 hours (mean difference -0.81 [95% CI: -1.61, -0.01], P = 0.046, I2 = 46%) after the surgery. Conclusion Epidural analgesia after the MIRPE had a better analgesic effect than IV analgesia from 12 hours to 48 hours after surgery, and AUC of VAS was lower in the epidural group. However, IV analgesia may also be a viable option, and physicians should wisely choose analgesic modalities after MIRPE.