Back to Search
Start Over
Effects on cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials of four clinically used head and neck measurement positions in healthy subjects
- Source :
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 141:729-735
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Informa UK Limited, 2021.
-
Abstract
- The most reliable head and neck position for cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) measurements yet to be determined.To assess how four body positions used during clinical recordings of cVEMPs affect cVEMP parameters.cVEMPs of 10 healthy subjects (26-50 years old) were recorded in four body positions:Mean background sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) electrical activity was significantly higher in positions C and D than in positions A and B. The latencies of p13 and n23 differed significantly among the four positions. Raw p13-n23 complex amplitude was significantly greater in positions C and D than in A and B. These differences were reduced when amplitudes were corrected by SCM activity. For positions A and B, one and two subjects, respectively, had an abnormal raw asymmetry ratio (AR). After correction, all subjects had normal ARs in all positions.Body positions in which the head is elevated produce a quicker and larger cVEMP response compared to positions in which the head is not elevated. The difference in ARs among positions can be ignored as long as the correction is made.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
business.industry
Vestibular evoked myogenic potential
Posture
Body position
Healthy subjects
General Medicine
Anatomy
Middle Aged
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
Healthy Volunteers
Otorhinolaryngology
Neck Muscles
Reference Values
mental disorders
Humans
Medicine
Female
business
Head and neck
psychological phenomena and processes
Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 16512251 and 00016489
- Volume :
- 141
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....f780d5d56c6938c5ec9db328d47bf9d9
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2021.1943520