Back to Search Start Over

The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire

Authors :
Albert Navarro
Ceyda Şahan
John Oudyk
Emilie Dupret
Hans-Joachim Lincke
Salvador Moncada
Peter M. Smith
Hermann Burr
Yücel Demiral
Hanne Berthelsen
Anne Pohrt
Matthias Nübling
Tage S. Kristensen
Christine Bocéréan
Clara Llorens
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA)
Malmø University
Cabinet Préventis Centre d’intervention pour la santé au travail (PREVENTIS)
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi = Dokuz Eylül University [Izmir] (DEÜ)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB)
Analyse et Traitement Informatique de la Langue Française (ATILF)
Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Monash University [Melbourne]
University of Toronto
Charité - UniversitätsMedizin = Charité - University Hospital [Berlin]
Source :
Safety and Health at Work, Vol 10, Iss 4, Pp 482-503 (2019), Safety and Health at Work, Safety and Health at Work, Elsevier, 2019, 10 (4), pp.482-503. ⟨10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002⟩, Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2019.

Abstract

Introduction: A new third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) has been developed in response to trends in working life, theoretical concepts, and international experience. A key component of the COPSOQ III is a defined set of mandatory core items to be included in national short, middle, and long versions of the questionnaire. The aim of the present article is to present and test the reliability of the new international middle version of the COPSOQ III. Methods: The questionnaire was tested among 23,361 employees during 2016–2017 in Canada, Spain, France, Germany, Sweden, and Turkey. A total of 26 dimensions (measured through scales or single items) of the middle version and two from the long version were tested. Psychometric properties of the dimensions were assessed regarding reliability (Cronbach α), ceiling and floor effects (fractions with extreme answers), and distinctiveness (correlations with other dimensions). Results: Most international middle dimensions had satisfactory reliability in most countries, though some ceiling and floor effects were present. Dimensions with missing values were rare. Most dimensions had low to medium intercorrelations. Conclusions: The COPSOQ III offers reliable and distinct measures of a wide range of psychosocial dimensions of modern working life in different countries; although a few measures could be improved. Future testing should focus on validation of the COPSOQ items and dimensions using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Such investigations would enhance the basis for recommendations using the COPSOQ III. Keywords: Psychosocial risk factors, Psychosocial working conditions, Risk assessment

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20937911
Volume :
10
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Safety and Health at Work
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f9692c9b46fc000f1fc1d4fd7ade79c0