Back to Search Start Over

Final five‐year results of the <scp>REMEDEE</scp> Registry: Real‐world experience with the dual‐therapy <scp>COMBO</scp> stent

Authors :
Arnoud W J van 't Hof
Philippe Muller
Karin Arkenbout
Ian B. A. Menown
Harry Suryapranata
Jaya Chandrasekhar
Pier Woudstra
Peter den Heijer
Andrés Iñiguez
Marcel A.M. Beijk
Karel T. Koch
Deborah N. Kalkman
Laura S.M. Kerkmeijer
Jan G.P. Tijssen
Andrejs Erglis
Robbert J. de Winter
Cardiology
Graduate School
ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes
ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias
ACS - Pulmonary hypertension & thrombosis
Source :
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 98(3), 503-510. Wiley-Liss Inc.
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

Objectives This final report from the REMEDEE Registry assessed the long‐term safety and efficacy of the dual‐therapy COMBO stent in a large unselected patient population. Background The bio‐engineered COMBO stent (OrbusNeich Medical BV, The Netherlands) is a dual‐therapy pro‐healing stent. Data of long‐term safety and efficacy of the this stent is lacking. Methods The prospective, multicenter, investigator‐initiated REMEDEE Registry evaluated clinical outcomes after COMBO stent implantation in daily clinical practice. One thousand patients were enrolled between June 2013 and March 2014. Results Five‐year follow‐up data were obtained in 97.2% of patients. At 5‐years, target lesion failure (TLF) (composite of cardiac death, target‐vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) was present in 145 patients (14.8%). Definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 0.9%, with no additional case beyond 3‐years of follow‐up. In males, 5‐year TLF‐rate was 15.6 versus 12.6% in females (p = .22). Patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) had TLF‐rate of 11.4%, noninsulin‐treated DM 22.7% (p = .001) and insulin‐treated DM 41.2% (p &lt; .001). Patients presenting with non‐ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE‐ACS) had higher incidence of TLF compared to non‐ACS (20.4 vs. 13.3%; p = .008), while incidence with STE‐ACS was comparable to non‐ACS (10.7 vs. 13.3%; p = .43). Conclusion Percutaneous coronary intervention with the dual‐therapy COMBO stent in unselected patient population shows low rates of TLF and ST to 5 years. Remarkably, no case of ST was noted beyond 3 years.

Details

ISSN :
1522726X and 15221946
Volume :
98
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f9ef238cde771f73f8a03fcf1822d1f8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29305