Back to Search
Start Over
4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
- Source :
- Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol 17, iss 1, Dyverfeldt, P; Bissell, M; Barker, AJ; Bolger, AF; Carlhäll, CJ; Ebbers, T; et al.(2015). 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5. UCSF: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6wq5b6jq, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- eScholarship, University of California, 2015.
-
Abstract
- Pulsatile blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is time-varying and multidirectional. Access to all regions, phases and directions of cardiovascular flows has formerly been limited. Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has enabled more comprehensive access to such flows, with typical spatial resolution of 1.5x1.5x1.5 - 3x3x3 mm(3), typical temporal resolution of 30-40 ms, and acquisition times in the order of 5 to 25 min. This consensus paper is the work of physicists, physicians and biomedical engineers, active in the development and implementation of 4D Flow CMR, who have repeatedly met to share experience and ideas. The paper aims to assist understanding of acquisition and analysis methods, and their potential clinical applications with a focus on the heart and greater vessels. We describe that 4D Flow CMR can be clinically advantageous because placement of a single acquisition volume is straightforward and enables flow through any plane across it to be calculated retrospectively and with good accuracy. We also specify research and development goals that have yet to be satisfactorily achieved. Derived flow parameters, generally needing further development or validation for clinical use, include measurements of wall shear stress, pressure difference, turbulent kinetic energy, and intracardiac flow components. The dependence of measurement accuracy on acquisition parameters is considered, as are the uses of different visualization strategies for appropriate representation of time-varying multidirectional flow fields. Finally, we offer suggestions for more consistent, user-friendly implementation of 4D Flow CMR acquisition and data handling with a view to multicenter studies and more widespread adoption of the approach in routine clinical investigations. Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council; Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden; Linkoping University; British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence; Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre; NIH [K25HL119608]; Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation; European Research Council [HEART4FLOW, 310612]; Radiological Society of North America (RSNA); NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust; Imperial College London; National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [R01 R01DK096169]; National Institute of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [R01HL115828]
- Subjects :
- PHASE-CONTRAST MRI
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Time Factors
Pulsatile flow
Review
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Recommendations
Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
computer.software_genre
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular System
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
170 Ethics
0302 clinical medicine
Computer-Assisted
IN-VIVO-VALIDATION
Medicine
TURBULENT KINETIC-ENERGY
Aorta
Medicine(all)
K-T BLAST
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Heart Disease
Cardiovascular Diseases
Pulsatile Flow
CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE
MR flow imaging
Data mining
Radiology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Blood Flow Velocity
Flow visualization
medicine.medical_specialty
Consensus
Group method of data handling
610 Medicine & health
Bioengineering
4D Flow CMR
WALL SHEAR-STRESS
SENSITIVE 4-DIMENSIONAL MRI
1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology
2705 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
03 medical and health sciences
Clinical
4D Flow MRI
Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
Hemodynamics
Flow quantification
Predictive Value of Tests
Coronary Circulation
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
2741 Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
BICUSPID AORTIC-VALVE
Humans
10237 Institute of Biomedical Engineering
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Representation (mathematics)
Image Interpretation
3614 Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Science & Technology
business.industry
Klinisk medicin
Visualization
Flow (mathematics)
PULSE-WAVE VELOCITY
Temporal resolution
Turbulence kinetic energy
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Clinical Medicine
business
computer
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol 17, iss 1, Dyverfeldt, P; Bissell, M; Barker, AJ; Bolger, AF; Carlhäll, CJ; Ebbers, T; et al.(2015). 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0174-5. UCSF: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6wq5b6jq, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....fa9221c83db06978153f87ba10994661