Back to Search Start Over

A novel clinical tool to classify facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy phenotypes

Authors :
Jessica Daolio
Fabiano Mele
Giuliano Tomelleri
Lucia Morandi
Liliana Vercelli
Grazia D'Angelo
Tiziana Mongini
Francesco Sera
Giovanni Antonini
Lucia Ruggiero
Elisabetta Bucci
Luisa Villa
Maria Chiara D’Amico
Michelangelo Cao
Giulia Ricci
Maurizio Moggio
Elena Pegoraro
Lorenzo Maggi
Carmelo Rodolico
Ana Nikolic
Antonio Di Muzio
Gabriele Siciliano
Corrado Angelini
Angela Berardinelli
Monica Govi
Lucio Santoro
Massimiliano Filosto
Rossella Tupler
Ricci, Giulia
Ruggiero, Lucia
Vercelli, Liliana
Sera, Francesco
Nikolic, Ana
Govi, Monica
Mele, Fabiano
Daolio, Jessica
Angelini, Corrado
Antonini, Giovanni
Berardinelli, Angela
Bucci, Elisabetta
Cao, Michelangelo
D’Amico, Maria Chiara
D’Angelo, Grazia
Di Muzio, Antonio
Filosto, Massimiliano
Maggi, Lorenzo
Moggio, Maurizio
Mongini, Tiziana
Morandi, Lucia
Pegoraro, Elena
Rodolico, Carmelo
Santoro, Lucio
Siciliano, Gabriele
Tomelleri, Giuliano
Villa, Luisa
Tupler, Rossella
Source :
Journal of Neurology
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Based on the 7-year experience of the Italian Clinical Network for FSHD, we revised the FSHD clinical form to describe, in a harmonized manner, the phenotypic spectrum observed in FSHD. The new Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form (CCEF) defines various clinical categories by the combination of different features. The inter-rater reproducibility of the CCEF was assessed between two examiners using kappa statistics by evaluating 56 subjects carrying the molecular marker used for FSHD diagnosis. The CCEF classifies: (1) subjects presenting facial and scapular girdle muscle weakness typical of FSHD (category A, subcategories A1–A3), (2) subjects with muscle weakness limited to scapular girdle or facial muscles (category B subcategories B1, B2), (3) asymptomatic/healthy subjects (category C, subcategories C1, C2), (4) subjects with myopathic phenotype presenting clinical features not consistent with FSHD canonical phenotype (D, subcategories D1, D2). The inter-rater reliability study showed an excellent concordance of the final four CCEF categories with a κ equal to 0.90; 95 % CI (0.71; 0.97). Absolute agreement was observed for categories C and D, an excellent agreement for categories A [κ = 0.88; 95 % CI (0.75; 1.00)], and a good agreement for categories B [κ = 0.79; 95 % CI (0.57; 1.00)]. The CCEF supports the harmonized phenotypic classification of patients and families. The categories outlined by the CCEF may assist diagnosis, genetic counseling and natural history studies. Furthermore, the CCEF categories could support selection of patients in randomized clinical trials. This precise categorization might also promote the search of genetic factor(s) contributing to the phenotypic spectrum of disease. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8123-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03405354
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....fc3010218411d55648760d042990e1c9