Back to Search
Start Over
Therapeutic hypothermia after paediatric cardiac arrest: Pooled randomized controlled trials
- Source :
- Resuscitation. 133:101-107
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2018.
-
Abstract
- Background Separate trials to evaluate therapeutic hypothermia after paediatric cardiac arrest for out-of-hospital and in-hospital settings reported no statistically significant differences in survival with favourable neurobehavioral outcome or safety compared to therapeutic normothermia. However, larger sample sizes might detect smaller clinical effects. Our aim was to pool data from identically conducted trials to approximately double the sample size of the individual trials yielding greater statistical power to compare outcomes. Methods Combine individual patient data from two clinical trials set in forty-one paediatric intensive care units in USA, Canada and UK. Children aged at least 48 h up to 18 years old, who remained comatose after resuscitation, were randomized within 6 h of return of circulation to hypothermia or normothermia (target 33.0 °C or 36.8 °C). The primary outcome, survival 12 months post-arrest with Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) score at least 70 (scored from 20 to 160, higher scores reflecting better function, population mean = 100, SD = 15), was evaluated among patients with pre-arrest scores ≥70. Results 624 patients were randomized. Among 517 with pre-arrest VABS-II scores ≥70, the primary outcome did not significantly differ between hypothermia and normothermia groups (28% [75/271] and 26% [63/246], respectively; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.42; p = 0.61). Among 602 evaluable patients, the change in VABS-II score from baseline to 12 months did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.20), nor did, proportion of cases with declines no more than 15 points or improvement from baseline [22% (hypothermia) and 21% (normothermia)]. One-year survival did not differ significantly between hypothermia and normothermia groups (44% [138/317] and 38% [113/ 297], respectively; relative risk, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.38; p = 0.15). Incidences of blood-product use, infection, and serious cardiac arrhythmia adverse events, and 28-day mortality, did not differ between groups. Conclusions Analysis of combined data from two paediatric cardiac arrest targeted temperature management trials including both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cases revealed that hypothermia, as compared with normothermia, did not confer a significant benefit in survival with favourable functional outcome at one year.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Population
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Neuropsychological Tests
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Emergency Nursing
Targeted temperature management
Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
Article
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
Hypothermia, Induced
law
Internal medicine
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Coma
Child
education
Adverse effect
education.field_of_study
business.industry
Infant
Hypothermia
Confidence interval
Clinical trial
Child, Preschool
Relative risk
Emergency Medicine
Female
medicine.symptom
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 03009572
- Volume :
- 133
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Resuscitation
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....fc7073a72371f744cae1454af8606251
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.011