Back to Search Start Over

Pregnancy outcome after first trimester exposure to ionizing radiations

Authors :
Delphine Beghin
Hubert Ducou Le Pointe
Eléonore Blondiaux
Ferdinand Dhombres
Stéphanie Friszer
Jean-Marie Jouannic
Lucie Guilbaud
Elisabeth Elefant
CHU Trousseau [APHP]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)
Sorbonne Université (SU)
Service de Radiologie [CHU Trousseau]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-CHU Trousseau [APHP]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU)
Source :
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Elsevier, 2019, 232, pp.18-21. ⟨10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.001⟩
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2019.

Abstract

International audience; OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ionizing radiation exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy in usual clinical situations.STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study using data collected between 1987 and 2014. This database was authorized by the French "Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés". The exposed group consisted of 319 pregnant women exposed to sub diaphragmatic ionizing radiations for diagnostic purposes, during the first trimester of pregnancy, and the control group consisted of 319 pregnant women without any exposure or exposed to non-teratogenic agents. Data on maternal history and radiations exposure were collected on first contact, and pregnancy outcomes were documented at follow-up. An univariate analysis was performed to compare both groups for the main outcomes.RESULTS: Exposure to sub diaphragmatic ionizing radiation for diagnosis purpose (median fetal dose of 3.1 mGy [0.2-130.0]) during the first trimester of pregnancy was not significantly associated with an increased risk of malformations (1.5% vs 1.8%, p = 1.00), miscarriage (7.8% vs 7.2%, p = 0.88), in utero fetal death (0.3% vs 0%, p = 1.00) or fetal growth restriction (5.4% vs 3.5%, p = 0.62).CONCLUSION: Pregnant women exposed to irradiant diagnostic procedures do not present a higher risk of malformations, miscarriage, in utero fetal death or fetal growth restriction and should be reassured, even if the examination focused on the pelvis.

Details

ISSN :
03012115
Volume :
232
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....fd6d6484f047c103954fbd1b31385e32
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.001