Back to Search
Start Over
Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology. 35:1194-1202
- Publication Year :
- 2017
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2017.
-
Abstract
- Purpose Patients who are diagnosed with stage IV metastatic melanoma have an estimated 5-year relative survival rate of only 17%. Randomized controlled trials of recent US Food and Drug Administration–approved immune checkpoint inhibitors—pembrolizumab (PEM), nivolumab (NIVO), and ipilumumab (IPI)—demonstrate improved patient outcomes, but the optimal treatment sequence in patients with BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma remains unclear. To inform policy makers about the value of these treatments, we developed a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of different strategies for sequencing novel agents for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Materials and Methods We developed Markov models by using a US-payer perspective and lifetime horizon to estimate costs (2016 US$) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for treatment sequences with first-line NIVO, IPI, NIVO + IPI, PEM every 2 weeks, and PEM every 3 weeks. Health states were defined for initial treatment, first and second progression, and death. Rates for drug discontinuation, frequency of adverse events, disease progression, and death obtained from randomized phase III trials were used to determine the likelihood of transition between states. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate model uncertainty. Results PEM every 3 weeks followed by second-line IPI was both more effective and less costly than dacarbazine followed by IPI then NIVO, or IPI followed by NIVO. Compared with the first-line dacarbazine treatment strategy, NIVO followed by IPI produced an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $90,871/QALY, and first-line NIVO + IPI followed by carboplatin plus paclitaxel chemotherapy produced an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of $198,867/QALY. Conclusion For patients with treatment-naive BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma, first-line PEM every 3 weeks followed by second-line IPI or first-line NIVO followed by second-line IPI are the most cost-effective, immune-based treatment strategies for metastatic melanoma.
- Subjects :
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
Oncology
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Paclitaxel
Cost effectiveness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Dacarbazine
Ipilimumab
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Disease-Free Survival
Carboplatin
03 medical and health sciences
chemistry.chemical_compound
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
Original Reports
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Melanoma
Survival rate
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
business.industry
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Cell Cycle Checkpoints
Health Care Costs
Markov Chains
Surgery
Quality-adjusted life year
Survival Rate
Models, Economic
Nivolumab
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
chemistry
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
business
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 35
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....fdc5c4d104f8961d5b5470ceb7c2ff4e