Back to Search Start Over

Gastric Wall Thickness and Linear Staple Height in Sleeve Gastrectomy in Japanese Patients with Obesity

Authors :
Masafumi Inomata
Takahide Kawasaki
Hiroaki Nakanuma
Atsuro Fujinaga
Masayuki Ohta
Yuichi Endo
Masahiro Kawamura
Teijiro Hirashita
Takashi Masuda
Kiminori Watanabe
Source :
Obesity Surgery. 32(2):349-354
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Springer Nature, 2022.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a standard procedure due to its low complication rates and favorable outcomes. However, limited data are available regarding the optimal size of linear staplers in relation to gastric wall thickness (GWT).<br />Methods: Between August 2016 and December 2020, we performed LSG in 70 patients with an average age, body weight, and body mass index of 42 years, 107 kg, and 40 kg/m2, respectively. We measured the GWT at the antrum, body, and fundus using resected specimens. We used an endo-linear stapler, and the closed staple height (CSH) was 1.75 mm.<br />Results: We found that the average GWT at the antrum was significantly thicker than the GWT at the body and fundus. There was a statistically significant relationship between body weight and the GWT at the antrum and body and obstructive sleep apnea and the GWT at the body. The average CSH/GWT ratios were 0.55, 0.62, and 0.90 at the antrum, body, and fundus, respectively. However, in 20 patients (29%), the CSH/GWT ratio at the fundus area was 〓1.0, and only preoperative body weight was a significant predictor for a CSH/GWT ratio of 〓1.0.<br />Conclusion: A light body weight may be related to a CSH/GWT ratio of 〓1.0 at the fundus.<br />Key Points: GWT at the antrum was significantly thicker than that at the body and fundus. GWT at the antrum and body statistically correlated with body weight. Preoperative body weight was a predictor for CSH/GWT ratio of 〓1.0 at the fundus

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09608923
Volume :
32
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Obesity Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ffc451a6ed70861fb6bf905248d3f975