Back to Search Start Over

Investigating variation in replicability

Authors :
Klein, Richard A.
Ratliff, Kate A.
Vianello, Michelangelo
Adams, Reginald B.
Bahník, Štěpán
Bernstein, Michael J.
Bocian, Konrad
Brandt, Mark J.
Brooks, Beach
Brumbaugh, Claudia Chloe
Cemalcilar, Zeynep
Chandler, Jesse
Cheong, Winnee
Davis, William E.
Devos, Thierry
Eisner, Matthew
Frankowska, Natalia
Furrow, David
Galliani, Elisa Maria
Hasselman, Fred
Hicks, Joshua A.
Hovermale, James F.
Hunt, S. Jane
Huntsinger, Jeffrey R.
IJzerman, Hans
John, Melissa-Sue
Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A.
Kappes, Heather Barry
Krueger, Lacy E.
Kurtz, Jaime
Levitan, Carmel A.
Mallett, Robyn K.
Morris, Wendy L.
Nelson, Anthony J.
Nier, Jason A.
Packard, Grant
Pilati, Ronaldo
Rutchick, Abraham M.
Schmidt, Kathleen
Skorinko, Jeanine L.
Smith, Robert
Steiner, Troy G.
Storbeck, Justin
Van Swol, Lyn M.
Thompson, Donna
van ‘t Veer, A. E.
Ann Vaughn, Leigh
Vranka, Marek
Wichman, Aaron L.
Woodzicka, Julie A.
Nosek, Brian A.
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Hogrefe, 2014.

Abstract

Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects – flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification – did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.

Subjects

Subjects :
BF Psychology

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.od.......206..131279e0d7fbef9ec6f9a38137878707