Back to Search Start Over

Targeted Temperature Management at 33 degrees C versus 36 degrees C after Cardiac Arrest

Authors :
Nielsen, Niklas
Wettersley, Jorn
Cronberg, Tobias
Erlinge, David
Gasche, Yvan
Hassager, Christian
Horn, Janneke
Hovdenes, Jan
Kjaergaard, Jesper
Kuiper, Michael
Pellis, Tommaso
Stammet, Pascal
Wanscher, Michael
Wise, Matt P.
Aneman, Anders
Al-Subaie, Nawaf
Boesgaard, Soren
Bro-Jeppesen, John
Brunetti, Iole
Bugge, Jan Frederik
Hingston, Christopher D.
Juffermans, Nicole P.
Koopmans, Matty
Kober, Lars
Langorgen, Jorund
Lilja, Gisela
Moller, Jacob Eifer
Rundgren, Malin
Rylander, Christian
Smid, Ondrej
Werer, Christophe
Winkel, Per
Friberg, Hans
TTM-trial investigators
HASH(0x55a75250fff0)
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine; 369(23), pp 2197-2206 (2013)
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, 2013.

Abstract

BackgroundUnconscious survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have a high risk of death or poor neurologic function. Therapeutic hypothermia is recommended by international guidelines, but the supporting evidence is limited, and the target temperature associated with the best outcome is unknown. Our objective was to compare two target temperatures, both intended to prevent fever. MethodsIn an international trial, we randomly assigned 950 unconscious adults after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause to targeted temperature management at either 33 degrees C or 36 degrees C. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality through the end of the trial. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neurologic function or death at 180 days, as evaluated with the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale and the modified Rankin scale. ResultsIn total, 939 patients were included in the primary analysis. At the end of the trial, 50% of the patients in the 33 degrees C group (235 of 473 patients) had died, as compared with 48% of the patients in the 36 degrees C group (225 of 466 patients) (hazard ratio with a temperature of 33 degrees C, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.28; P=0.51). At the 180-day follow-up, 54% of the patients in the 33 degrees C group had died or had poor neurologic function according to the CPC, as compared with 52% of patients in the 36 degrees C group (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P=0.78). In the analysis using the modified Rankin scale, the comparable rate was 52% in both groups (risk ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.14; P=0.87). The results of analyses adjusted for known prognostic factors were similar. ConclusionsIn unconscious survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause, hypothermia at a targeted temperature of 33 degrees C did not confer a benefit as compared with a targeted temperature of 36 degrees C. (Funded by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation and others; TTM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01020916.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00284793
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine; 369(23), pp 2197-2206 (2013)
Accession number :
edsair.od......1110..a3920750eebeb2ca6ad385ae63a4db6b