Back to Search Start Over

Risk factors for atherosclerotic and medial arterial calcification of the intracranial internal carotid artery

Authors :
Vos, Annelotte
Kockelkoren, Remko
de Vis, Jill B.
van der Schouw, Yvonne T.
van der Schaaf, I. C.
Velthuis, B. K.
Mali, W. P.
de Jong, Pim A.
Majoie, C. B.
Roos, Y. B.
Duijm, L. E.
Keizer, K.
van der Lugt, A.
Dippel, D. W.
Droogh-de Greve, K. E.
Bienfait, H. P.
van Walderveen, M. A.
Wermer, M. J.H.
Lycklama à Nijeholt, G. J.
Boiten, J.
Duyndam, D.
Kwa, V. I.
Meijer, F. J.
van Dijk, E. J.
Kesselring, F. O.
Hofmeijer, J.
Vos, J. A.
Schonewille, W. J.
van Rooij, W. J.
de Kort, P. L.
Pleiter, C. C.
Bakker, S. L.
Bot, J.
Visser, M. C.
Dankbaar, J. W.
van Seeters, T.
Horsch, A. D.
Niesten, J. M.
Biessels, G. J.
Kappelle, L. J.
Luitse, M. J.
van der Graaf, Y.
the DUST study group
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background and aims: Calcifications of the intracranial internal carotid artery (iICA) are an important risk factor for stroke. The calcifications can occur both in the intimal and medial layer of the vascular wall. The aim of this study is to assess whether medial calcification in the iICA is differently related to risk factors for cardiovascular disease, compared to intimal calcification. Methods: Unenhanced thin slice computed tomography (CT) scans from 1132 patients from the Dutch acute stroke study cohort were assessed for dominant localization of calcification (medial or intimal) by one of three observers based on established methodology. Associations between known cardiovascular risk factors (age, gender, body mass index, pulse pressure, eGFR, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, previous vascular disease, and family history) and the dominant localization of calcifications were assessed via logistic regression analysis. Results: In the 1132 patients (57% males, mean age 67.4 years [SD 13.8]), dominant intimal calcification was present in 30.9% and dominant medial calcification in 46.9%. In 10.5%, no calcification was seen. Age, pulse pressure and family history were risk factors for both types of calcification. Multivariably adjusted risk factors for dominant intimal calcification only were smoking (OR 2.09 [CI 1.27–3.44]) and hypertension (OR 2.09 [CI 1.29–3.40]) and for dominant medial calcification diabetes mellitus (OR 2.39 [CI 1.11–5.14]) and previous vascular disease (OR 2.20 [CI 1.30–3.75]). Conclusions: Risk factors are differently related to the dominant localizations of calcifications, a finding that supports the hypothesis that the intimal and medial calcification represents a distinct etiology.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.od.....10691..8c2f3d3e526c0712155d5a5b1055a327