Back to Search
Start Over
Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers
- Source :
- BMC Medical Education
- Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- Background A portfolio of supporting information (SI) reflecting a doctor’s entire medical practice is now a central aspect of UK appraisal for revalidation. Medical revalidation, introduced in 2012, is an assessment of a doctor’s competence and passing results in a five yearly license to practice medicine. It assesses of a doctor’s professional development, workplace performance and reflection and aims to provide assurance that doctors are up-to-date and fit to practice. The dominant assessment mechanism is a portfolio. The content of the revalidation portfolio has been increasingly prescribed and the assessment of the SI is a fundamental aspect of the appraisal process which ultimately allows Responsible Officers (ROs) to make recommendations on revalidation. ROs, themselves doctors, were the first to undergo UK revalidation. This qualitative study explored the perceptions of ROs and their appraisers about the use of this portfolio of evidence in a summative revalidation appraisal. Methods 28 purposefully sampled London ROs were interviewed following their revalidation appraisal and 17 of their appraisers participated in focus groups and interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify commonalities and differences of experience. Results SI was mostly easy to provide but there were challenges in gathering certain aspects. ROs did not understand in what quantities they should supply SI or what it should look like. Appraisers were concerned about making robust judgements based on the evidence supplied. A lack of reflection from the process of collating SI and preparing for appraisal was noted and learning came more from the appraisal interview itself. Conclusions More explicit guidance must be available to both appraisee and appraiser about what SI is required, how much, how it should be used and, how it will be assessed. The role of SI in professional learning and revalidation must be clarified and further empirical research is required to examine how best to use this evidence to make judgments as part of this type of appraisal.
- Subjects :
- Self-Assessment
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Portfolios
education
Reflection
Focus Groups
Assessment
Licensure, Medical
Clinical governance
Quality
State Medicine
Revalidation
Interviews as Topic
England
Physicians
Learning tools
London
Employee Performance Appraisal
Humans
Clinical Competence
Qualitative Research
Appraisal
Research Article
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14726920
- Volume :
- 16
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- BMC medical education
- Accession number :
- edsair.pmid..........0420ae65b63b880445cc6e15b22abd22