[Whole-heart coronary MR angiography -- initial results]

To evaluate a new coronary MR angiography technique covering the whole coronary artery tree in one data set acquisition.Six healthy volunteers and 15 patients with known CAD were examined with a navigator gated and corrected (NAV) free-breathing 3D steady-state free precession sequence covering the whole heart (WH-MRA) (TR = 5.4, TE = 2.7, SENSE factor = 2, 160 slices, 0.75 mm reconstructed slice thickness, in-plane resolution = 0.99 x 0.99 mm(2), scan time 14 min [50 % NAV efficiency]) and a vessel targeted 3D SSFP MRA sequence (t-MRA) (TR = 5.6 ms, TE = 2.8 ms, 20 slices of 1.5 mm reconstructed slice thickness, in-plane resolution = 0.99 x 0.99 mm(2), scan time = 7 min [50 % NAV efficiency]). Subjective image quality (4-point scale) and objective image quality parameters including vessel sharpness, vessel diameter and CNR were calculated for WH-MRA and t-MRA. In patients, the accuracy for detection of stenosis larger than 50 % was compared to the accuracy of X-ray coronary angiography (XA), which was considered the standard.WH-MRA demonstrated good vessel visibility in healthy subjects (100 %) whereas vessel visibility in patients was limited (78 % in an 8 segment evaluation). Vessel sharpness was inferior to that of t-MRA in patients (37 vs. 42 %) but equal in healthy subjects (42 %). Vessel diameter did not differ significantly between WH-MRA and t-MRA. CNR was significantly reduced for WH-MRA (CNR 7.4 vs. 11.5). The diagnostic accuracy for the detection of CAD was comparable for both MRA approaches (85.5 vs. 86.2 %).WH-MRA allows good coronary artery visualization in healthy subjects and patients and provides a simplified scanning procedure and advantages in 3D post-processing. Regarding image parameters and the detection of CAD, the results are comparable to those acquired with t-MRA. The major disadvantage remains the high number of diagnostically insufficient images.