Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Southern Wisconsin Pneumatic Retinopexy Study Group

To compare pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckling for repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with respect to visual outcome, single-procedure reattachment rate, and development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy.A consecutive series of eyes initially treated with pneumatic retinopexy (n = 56) between March 1986 and February 1996 were compared with a selected group of eyes treated with scleral buckling (n = 86) with similar location and distribution of retinal breaks and absence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. A regression model was developed to adjust for underlying differences between treatment groups, resulting in a cohort of 50 eyes in each group for final comparison. A minimum follow-up of 6 months was obtained.Single-procedure reattachment rate was significantly higher for scleral buckle eyes (42 of 50 eyes, 84%) than for pneumatic retinopexy eyes (31 of 50 eyes, 62%; Por = .01). Correspondingly, reoperation rate was significantly higher for pneumatic retinopexy eyes (19 of 50 eyes, 38%) than for scleral buckle eyes (7 of 50 eyes, 14%; Por = .01). Multiple regression analysis evaluating perioperative factors demonstrated that the use of pneumatic retinopexy was the sole factor predictive of retinal detachment after a single procedure (relative odds = 2.20, P = .02). Final reattachment rate, after reoperations, was 98% (49 of 50 eyes) in each group. Except for nonphakic eyes, final visual outcome and rate of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy development did not differ significantly between the two procedures.In phakic eyes, pneumatic retinopexy was associated with a significantly higher reoperation rate than scleral buckling, but resulted in equivalent final visual outcome and reattachment rate after reoperations. If used, it must be incorporated into a strategy in which patient and physician are prepared for a greater chance of reoperation compared to initial management with scleral buckling.