Back to Search Start Over

[Effects of treating ostial left anterior descending artery stenosis by drug eluting stents via precisely positioning or crossing over into left main stem]

Authors :
Zhan, Gao
Yue-jin, Yang
Ji-lin, Chen
Shu-bin, Qiao
Bo, Xu
Xue-wen, Qin
Min, Yao
Hai-bo, Liu
Yong-jian, Wu
Jin-qing, Yuan
Jue, Chen
Shi-jie, You
Jian-jun, Li
Run-lin, Gao
Source :
Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi. 36(2)
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

To compare the effect of treating ostial left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenosis using drug-eluting stents (DES) by precisely positioning versus crossing over into left main (LM) technique.From April 2004 to May 2006, DES implantations in 224 consecutive patients with ostial LAD lesions were performed by precisely positioning in 161 patients (P group) and crossing over into LM in 63 patients (C group). Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed at 7 months post DES implantations.Relevant vessel diameter (RVD) was significantly larger (3.44 +/- 0.52 mm vs. 3.17 +/- 0.40 mm, P = 0.039) and LM/LAD diameter ratio was significantly lower (1.16 +/- 0.07 vs. 1.28 +/- 0.05, P = 0.000) in C group compared that in P group. Stent (3.53 +/- 0.31 mm vs. 3.16 +/- 0.29 mm, P = 0.035) and postdilatation balloon (3.59 +/- 0.65 mm vs. 3.24 +/- 0.32 mm, P = 0.035) diameter were significantly larger and postdilatation (94.1% vs. 29.5%, P = 0.000) and kissing balloon (47.1% vs. 15.2%, P = 0.000) rates were significantly higher in P group than that in C group. Both groups achieved 100% procedure success rate. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate (4.3% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.447), death (0 vs. 0, P = 1.000), AMI (1, 2% vs. 1.6%, P = 1.000) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate (3.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.325) were similar between the 2 groups. One patient in P group developed subacute in-stent thrombosis. Follow-up angiography at 7 months showed that in-stent (0 vs.7.7%, P = 0.316) and in-segment restenosis rate (3.8%vs. 10.8%, P = 0.431) tended to be lower while in-stent (0.12 +/- 0.08 mm vs. 0.59 +/- 0.37 mm, P = 0.000) and in-segment (0.17 +/- 0.09 mm vs. 0.64 +/- 0.49 mm, P = 0.000) late loss were significantly lower in C group compared with P group.Compared with precisely positioning technique, crossing over into LM technique was more feasible and tended to reduce restenosis rate for ostial LAD lesions treated with DES.

Details

ISSN :
02533758
Volume :
36
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi
Accession number :
edsair.pmid..........520fa7e09c6b47986fd6089b1ad7abde