Back to Search Start Over

Experimental Comparison of the

Authors :
Vera S, Ruzanova
Anastasia S, Proskurina
Genrikh S, Ritter
Yaroslav R, Efremov
Valeriy P, Nikolin
Nelly A, Popova
Vasiliy A, Naprimerov
Evgenia V, Dolgova
Ekaterina A, Potter
Svetlana S, Kirikovich
Evgeniy V, Levites
Zakhar S, Mustafin
Sergey A, Lashin
Ekaterina A, Burakova
Dmitry A, Stetsenko
Alexandr A, Ostanin
Elena R, Chernykh
Sergey S, Bogachev
Source :
Anticancer research. 41(7)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

We compared the therapeutic efficacy of two recently developed experimental anticancer technologies: 1) in situ vaccination based on local immunotherapy with CpG oligonucleotides and anti-OX40 antibodies to activate antitumor immune response and 2) "Karanahan" technology [from the Sanskrit kāraṇa ('source') + han ('to kill')] based on the combined injection of cyclophosphamide and double-stranded DNA to eradicate cancer stem cells.The anticancer approaches were compared on three types of mouse malignant tumors with different grades of immunogenicity: weakly immunogenic carcinoma Krebs-2, moderately immunogenic Lewis carcinoma, and highly immunogenic A20 В-cellular lymphoma.Our results indicated that in situ vaccination was the most effective against the highly immunogenic tumor А20. In addition, "Karanahan" demonstrated high efficiency in all types of tumors, regardless of their immunogenicity or size."Karanahan" therapy showed higher efficacy relative to in situ vaccination with CpG oligonucleotides and anti-OX40 antibodies.

Details

ISSN :
17917530
Volume :
41
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Anticancer research
Accession number :
edsair.pmid..........8c897ca81a69fb26e3513093fb94c8bc