Back to Search Start Over

CMS Innovation Center Health Care Innovation Awards: Evaluation Plan

Authors :
Sandra H, Berry
Thomas W, Concannon
Kristy Gonzalez, Morganti
David I, Auerbach
Megan K, Beckett
Peggy G, Chen
Donna O, Farley
Bing, Han
Katherine M, Harris
Spencer S, Jones
Hangsheng, Liu
Susan L, Lovejoy
Terry, Marsh
Grant R, Martsolf
Christopher, Nelson
Edward N, Okeke
Marjorie L, Pearson
Francesca, Pillemer
Melony E, Sorbero
Vivian, Towe
Robin M, Weinick
Source :
Rand health quarterly. 3(3)
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within the Centers for MedicareMedicaid Services (CMS) has funded 108 Health Care Innovation Awards, funded through the Affordable Care Act, for applicants who proposed compelling new models of service delivery or payment improvements that promise to deliver better health, better health care, and lower costs through improved quality of care for Medicare, Medicaid, and Children's Health Insurance Program enrollees. CMS is also interested in learning how new models would affect subpopulations of beneficiaries (e.g., those eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and complex patients) who have unique characteristics or health care needs that could be related to poor outcomes. In addition, the initiative seeks to identify new models of workforce development and deployment, as well as models that can be rapidly deployed and have the promise of sustainability. This article describes a strategy for evaluating the results. The goal for the evaluation design process is to create standardized approaches for answering key questions that can be customized to similar groups of awardees and that allow for rapid and comparable assessment across awardees. The evaluation plan envisions that data collection and analysis will be carried out on three levels: at the level of the individual awardee, at the level of the awardee grouping, and as a summary evaluation that includes all awardees. Key dimensions for the evaluation framework include implementation effectiveness, program effectiveness, workforce issues, impact on priority populations, and context. The ultimate goal is to identify strategies that can be employed widely to lower cost while improving care.

Details

ISSN :
21628254
Volume :
3
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Rand health quarterly
Accession number :
edsair.pmid..........bde41412cc2fef5e8c2891e35213375e