Financial burden of healthcare utilization in consumer-directed health plans

To evaluate the impact of enrollment in a consumer-directed health plan (CDHP) on out-of-pocket (OOP) spending and on the financial burden associated with healthcare utilization.Using commercial claims data from 2011 through 2013, we estimated difference-in-differences models that compared changes in outcomes for individuals who switched to CDHPs (CDHP group) with outcome changes for individuals who remained in traditional plans (traditional plan group).We estimated the impact of CDHP enrollment on OOP spending at the point of care and on having high financial burden, defined as whether an enrollee spent 3% or more of household income on OOP spending. Additionally, we assessed these outcomes for 2 subgroups: those with lower household income and those with chronic conditions.Within the first year of CDHP enrollment, CDHP enrollees experienced a mean marginal increase in OOP spending of $285 (41% increase; 95% CI, $271-$299; P.001) relative to traditional plan enrollees. The lower-income and chronic conditions subgroups experienced mean marginal increases in OOP costs of $306 (44% increase; 95% CI, $257-$353; P.001) and $387 (56% increase; 95% CI, $339-$435; P.001), respectively. The probability of an enrollee having excessive financial burden increased by 4.3 percentage points (95% CI, 4.0-4.6; P.001) for the full CDHP sample. These effects were about 3 times larger for the lower-income subgroup (12.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 10.7-13.8; P.001) and 2 times larger for the chronic conditions subgroup (8.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.9-9.1; P.001).CDHP enrollment led to a significant increase in financial burden associated with healthcare utilization, especially for those with lower incomes and those with chronic conditions.