A randomised comparison of ceftazidime and piperacillin, both in combination with flucloxacillin for treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic children. Finnish Three-Centre Study

111 febrile episodes in 98 neutropenic children were randomly treated with either ceftazidime (CAZ) 150 mg/kg/day or with piperacillin (PIP) 200 mg/kg/day, both combined with flucloxacillin (FLUC) 50 mg/kg/day. A total of 37/47 (79%) eligible episodes in the CAZ group and 41/53 (77%) in the PIP group were cured without needing to stop the initial therapy. The success without modification of the treatment in the verified septicaemias in the CAZ group was 8/18 (44%) and in the PIP group 5/18 (28%). Of the bacteriologically documented infections, 13/24 (54%) in the CAZ group and 11/24 (46%) in the PIP group were cured without modification of the therapy. Similarly, 17/31 (55%) of all the isolated bacteria in the CAZ group and 14/33 (42%) in the PIP group were eradicated with the initial therapy. Overall there were 13 deaths of which 4 in the CAZ group and 5 in the PIP group occurred during the infection. An increasing granulocyte count exceeding 0.25 x 10(9)/l at the end of the therapy was a good prognostic sign for the outcome of the infection. This study indicates that CAZ is as effective as PIP in the treatment of infections in neutropenic children.