Back to Search Start Over

VERDICT MRI for prostate cancer: intracellular volume fraction versus apparent diffusion coefficient

Authors :
Edward W, Johnston
Elisenda, Bonet-Carne
Uran, Ferizi
Ben, Yvernault
Hayley, Pye
Dominic, Patel
Joey, Clemente
Wivijin, Piga
Susan, Heavey
Harbir S, Sidhu
Francesco, Giganti
James, O'Callaghan
Mrishta, Brizmohun Appayya
Alistair, Grey
Alexandra, Saborowska
Sebastien, Ourselin
David, Hawkes
Caroline M, Moore
Mark, Emberton
Hashim U, Ahmed
Hayley, Whitaker
Manuel, Rodriguez-Justo
Alexander, Freeman
David, Atkinson
Daniel, Alexander
Eleftheria, Panagiotaki
Shonit, Punwani
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Radiological Society of North America, 2019.

Abstract

Background Biologic specificity of diffusion MRI in relation to prostate cancer aggressiveness may improve by examining separate components of the diffusion MRI signal. The Vascular, Extracellular, and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumors (VERDICT) model estimates three distinct signal components and associates them to (a) intracellular water, (b) water in the extracellular extravascular space, and (c) water in the microvasculature. Purpose To evaluate the repeatability, image quality, and diagnostic utility of intracellular volume fraction (FIC) maps obtained with VERDICT prostate MRI and to compare those maps with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for Gleason grade differentiation. Materials and Methods Seventy men (median age, 62.2 years; range, 49.5-82.0 years) suspected of having prostate cancer or undergoing active surveillance were recruited to a prospective study between April 2016 and October 2017. All men underwent multiparametric prostate and VERDICT MRI. Forty-two of the 70 men (median age, 67.7 years; range, 50.0-82.0 years) underwent two VERDICT MRI acquisitions to assess repeatability of FIC measurements obtained with VERDICT MRI. Repeatability was measured with use of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The image quality of FIC and ADC maps was independently evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. Forty-two men (median age, 64.8 years; range, 49.5-79.6 years) underwent targeted biopsy, which enabled comparison of FIC and ADC metrics in the differentiation between Gleason grades. Results VERDICT MRI FIC demonstrated ICCs of 0.87-0.95. There was no significant difference between image quality of ADC and FIC maps (score, 3.1 vs 3.3, respectively; P = .90). FIC was higher in lesions with a Gleason grade of at least 3+4 compared with benign and/or Gleason grade 3+3 lesions (mean, 0.49 ± 0.17 vs 0.31 ± 0.12, respectively; P = .002). The difference in ADC between these groups did not reach statistical significance (mean, 1.42 vs 1.16 × 10-3 mm2/sec; P = .26). Conclusion Fractional intracellular volume demonstrates high repeatability and image quality and enables better differentiation of a Gleason 4 component cancer from benign and/or Gleason 3+3 histology than apparent diffusion coefficient. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sigmund and Rosenkrantz in this issue.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.pmid.dedup....f3605441a6d3f34c388abc07ac5838af